Tim Floyd

[LSUConnMan]

Like they say; "if you're not cheatin, you're not tryin".

USC bball remarkably improves upon that concept...and if you get caught, self impose a post-season ban...on a team that never made the post season when they weren't cheating.

[Lafitte the Pirate]

USC is scheduled to go before the NCAA Infractions Committee on Feb. 19. Floyd is not expected to be there. Take that for what you will.

Where did you get this info? Floyd does not have a show cause on him at this time. My understanding is that he will be there on Feb. 19.

Again, show me your source.

[RCAJUN90]

Where did you get this info? Floyd does not have a show cause on him at this time. My understanding is that he will be there on Feb. 19.

Again, show me your source. _

Bump! I have no idea what you are talking about but it was at 666 views!

[Parrott]

Where did you get this info? Floyd does not have a show cause on him at this time. My understanding is that he will be there on Feb. 19.

Again, show me your source.

I did not say that Floyd is under Just Cause/Show Cause. I explained what happened previously for UL's old baseball coach and Cal's old basketball coach. Slow down read what I wrote and it's pretty easy to understand.

My source that Floyd won't be there? ESPN.com recently wrote a story stating that Floyd won't be there.

Given that the NBA season will still be going on and ESPN.com's report, I wouldn't expect him to be there. (Plus, he doesn't have to be there.)

Hope that clears eveything up.

igeaux.mobi

[Lafitte the Pirate]

I did not say that Floyd is under Just Cause/Show Cause. I explained what happened previously for UL's old baseball coach and Cal's old basketball coach. Slow down read what I wrote and it's pretty easy to understand.

igeaux.mobi

I do not recall asking you if he is under a Show Cause. You need to read what I wrote and do your homework. You have already burned a few bridges already.

[RaginDave]

slow down LtP, Josh answered your question. Not sure where this hostility is coming from.

He stated that his source was a recent article from ESPN.com.

[Parrott]

LtP: I "did my homework" in this case. You just didn't like the response. I did my best to clear the air and provide the source you asked for. I explained what Just Cause/Show Cause was, you said Floyd wasn't under that and I pointed out that I never said he was in case there was any confusion.

My intent was to answer your questions and eliminate any confusion on this subject. I have no interest in starting arguments with strangers on a message board, and I hope you and everyone here understands that.

As for saying that I've "burned a few bridges": I'm doing just fine in continuing to gather and report accurate news, but I appreciate your concern.

igeaux.mobi

[Parrott]

Now ESPN.com is reporting that Floyd did appear before the committee:

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...ht-thing-to-do

http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/po...ecide-its-fate

[CajunRed]

I do not recall asking you if he is under a Show Cause. You need to read what I wrote and do your homework. You have already burned a few bridges already. _

Wow! Why such hostility?

[MetryCajun]

Wow! Why such hostility?

Parrott obviously crossed the pirate at some point.
On this topic, Floyd should not be a candidate for our opening....too much bagage.

igeaux.mobi