If we are going to assign him blame for the losses, then he gets credit for coaching in wins. He out coached the other guy 42 times at UL.
I don't think that's the issue. It's when has his coaching elevated the team's performance above it's apparent talent level? When has he done more with less? Ever? I think three of the 4 bowl wins he did. But after that the pickens are slim. And in many cases he had his pants pulled down by the other coach on national TV. I'm not sure why he coaches so well in the bowl games....outclassing 3 teams that were arguably better than us, but can't do it during the regular season, or really come even close.
It's my analogy Turbine! I make the rules! LOL
Seriously, I consider the sum total of coaching, in all respects, to be a football "chess" strategy for winning football games. So, if you've been "out-coached"... you have lost the "football chess match". In my use of those terms, there is no wiggle room. I am saying that when it comes to coaching... there are displays of coaching skills at every game that are either better or worse than the opponent. Every single down. And PS... every athlete on a team is there by permission of the coaching staff.
Huge part of the problem. The media here says that about the teams, but when our team has a losing record, "we're better than the record indicates".
Don't care if you went to overtime with in your last 2. You went OT with NMSU (2 straight losses to them btw), and Tulane (don't even have players to run the coach's scheme).
4-8 last year and 2-3 this year.. that's a trend.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)