Do you think the difference could be recruiting opportunities and marketing/publicity?We actually started thinking about a home game in the Superdome not long after I first got here,” athletic director Scott Farmer said.
So based on that timeline we should expect the Alden report to be fully implemented by 2035.
Looking at the numbers...this is a ____ deal. I could be wrong, and please correct me if I make a huge error. In 2018 Mississippi State will host us. They don't have to pay us a dime to come to their stadium. They have 100% of the expenses, and 100% of the revenues, and with a sell out like I'm sure it will be, is a small fortune. With about 61,000 seats, let's use $40 a seat just to keep the numbers simple, and $200,000 like it would cost the Superdome again just to keep things simple. That's revenue of $2,440,000, and expenses of $200,000, for a net profit of $2,240,000. That's not bad, and they have zero guarantee they would have to pay so it's all gravy. Man they made out like bandits...glad they found a willing accomplice to fleece.
2019 we head down to New Orleans to play them. Revenue sales will take care of expenses up to $200,000. I doubt the Superdome will sell out, but let's keep things equal here and say 61,000 at $40 a seat also. That's revenue of $2,440,000, and expenses of $200,000, for a net profit of $2,240,000. UL gets 57% of that, for $1,276,800. Miss St gets $963,200.
So all in all UL gets $1,276,800...Miss State gets $3,203,200...over a two year period. The problem is, we could make that kind of money with a sell out of our own with a quality SEC opponent, and we wouldn't have to give them anything from the gate. That would not only benefit the University, but the city itself. Now...we are punting everything and giving all the benefit to New Orleans.
I don't see the reason why a 2 for 1 without a guarantee is a problem for us. It brings the quality programs people want to see to Cajun Field. Not to New Orleans. This deal does way more for Miss State as a program, than it does for UL.