You should be blasting the coach. He is the head coach, and even if he doesn't run the schemes, he has his hands in that decision. It's also Hud's job to make sure they are doing their jobs. He hasn't done that in a few years. If you want a team that is run like Animal House...go for it.
I am confused. First you said Hud dictates the scheme to the DC who then runs what he is told. Now you are saying he may not run the scheme but is involved. Well that is a news flash! Aren't HC supposed to have their hands on all decisions?
This point is fairly important. If Hud is calling the defense and telling the DC what to do then I am in agreement with you. His ego is too big and he needs to go. If you are just making up stuff to complete your narrative that Hud is a egomaniacal muscle head then we can all ignore your thoughts on the subject.
We all know Hud is ultimately responsible for the defense. The only thing that matters is if they get better. If they continue on this path, Hud will eventually be gone.
If Harbison was the co-defensive coordinator why wasn't he promoted or fired inquiring minds want to know
I agree about Walker and Jones. AND, if you are going to rush off the ends, why not bring in Granier or Osborne or someone who may be able to generate some pressure off the end? It made no sense. If you're going to keep those guys on the field, blitz a LB or even both and keep them in coverage where they need to be. It absolutely made no sense.
Hud continues to be emphatic that this defense was Melvin Smith's and his alone. Not sure what that means if he was a co-coordinator but it appears he called the shots. I certainly understand not promoting him in that case since he's still tied, on paper, to that debacle we saw so maybe Hud just wanted to start fresh. If not, there is certainly more to the story that we may not hear.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)