So an existing campus, with existing employees, and existing students is somehow "Obviously new," in the Alt-Reality that defines USL?
So an existing campus, with existing employees, and existing students is somehow "Obviously new," in the Alt-Reality that defines USL?
There's no mention of worthiness in my post.
Now you're simply fabricating things out of whole cloth.
The Legislature Created the ULS System in 1974. The Judge ruled in 1984 that USL had no right to coopt the name of the entire system.
Later the Legislature provided a road to use of the name, with some stipulations.
You ultimately got what you wanted, the ability to rebrand as the University of Louisiana....@Lafayette.
Why do you continue to _____, whine and moan nearly 20 years later?
I gotta give you props, FPC. Your schtick was pretty funny when you first got here.
But it's gotten genuinely sad seeing the pure envy shine through.
Hope you and your buddies have a good time in Lafayette today. Safe travels
And, pointedly, they were allowed to make the change with the same proviso you had .... that they had to use their municipal designation .... Texas State University AT San Marcos, which would allow the other members of the system to do the same thing, with municipal designators.
However, the members of the Texas State University System didn't rely on a double directional naming convention, with one exception, instead opting to name schools after prominent individuals, kinda like McNeese and in some cases cardinal directional indicators, i.e., North Texas and West Texas.
Like Louisiana, Texas has a flagship university. The University of Texas. There are no flagships in the Texas State system.
Louisiana does it the other way around. The flagship is in the Louisiana State System, not the ULS system.
If the legislature intended for the University of Louisiana to have anything remotely approaching a flagship, it's in Monroe, where the Pharmacy school is.
Texas State was recently able to change their name because...wait for it....the LEGISLATURE said that they could.
Primarily because nobody else wanted the name.
Thanks for the well wishes. You too.
Here's to a hard fought, injury free game!
P.S. - I agree with you about the envy thing. Which is why you guys really should pull Turdbine aside and tell him to let it go on blaming LSU for the name thing nearly 20 years after the legislature definitively settled what you can call yourselves.
Call it a Ragervention...
That is NOT from RaginPagin.com as you say, it is from http://ragincajuns.com/news/2011/10/28/Name.aspx and it is flat out wrong in many areas.
I have said many times, this school does not know its history, and if you dont know your history, you cant plot your future. If they want to get it right they should call me, my emails on the topic were not responded to.
Here is a factual post on the first use of Bulldog. https://forumeus.com/...og-Mascot-1921
John McNeese was not a Bulldog.
All those Vermillion propaganda pages look alike
Which Vermillion propaganda site is THAT from?
There are currently 16 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 16 guests)