Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 99

Thread: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

  1. #37

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    I would not be surprised if McNeese walked out with the W.


  2. #38

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by ulXrunner View Post
    I would not be surprised if McNeese walked out with the W.
    this would be a major nail in Huds coffin.. That loss would be unforgivable. The only way to compare our program is going up against the georgia's of the world as well as in state opponents. The damage done would be catastrophic. I for one have not forgotten our 2 losses to tech and to throw Mcleast in would be something I could not forget. Gents, Mcleast has D1 cast offs too and they have talent. But this had better be a 17 point victory or more. Otherwise Hud needs to refund some money .

  3. #39

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by angeleast View Post
    this would be a major nail in Huds coffin.. That loss would be unforgivable. The only way to compare our program is going up against the georgia's of the world as well as in state opponents. The damage done would be catastrophic. I for one have not forgotten our 2 losses to tech and to throw Mcleast in would be something I could not forget. Gents, Mcleast has D1 cast offs too and they have talent. But this had better be a 17 point victory or more. Otherwise Hud needs to refund some money .
    I don't believe they will win this game, but I'm not predicting a stomping from the Cajuns. Guidry did a good job defending Hudspeth while at Western Kentucky, but I don't see this as a loss.

  4. #40

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunT View Post
    I'm don't believe they will win this game, but I'm not predicting a stomping from the Cajuns. Guidry did a good job defending Hudspeth while at Western Kentucky, but I don't see this as a loss.
    Yes.. Guidry is a gambler style coach in the same mold Hud used to be in his first season b4 he became hard headed and seemingly stagnant .

  5. Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by ulXrunner View Post
    I would not be surprised if McNeese walked out with the W.
    Based on McNeese 2007, UL 2015, or some other variable?

  6. #42

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Man I can't take Schultz serious. That dudes voice annoys the s..h..i..t out of me. He reminds me of a politician who says anything to gain popularity.
    PS: I don't listen to jay walker either.


  7. #43

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    Guys, before we start predicting blowouts, let's just try to beat them please. That would be nice for a change.
    This. There is nothing that could tell me that we will all of a sudden become some sort of offensive juggernaut that can score 50 points on anybody, regardless of their conference. McNeese will always have the highest of motivation to beat us, in our house, and I hope we can match it which is Hud's job to do.

  8. #44

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by scotto_25 View Post
    Quit being scared of McNeese. This isn't a Bustle driven bus anymore. We don't offer recruits crawfish dinners to lure them into our double-wides anymore.

    Talent separation over the past 5+ years is the difference. We have "quality" athletes now, not just glorified all district players that got 3 offers from ULM, UL, and Milsaps
    And all this talent took the college football world by storm last year with 4 wins. 4! I do agree that our talent level is much better than it was in 07 but lets not make this out to be something it isn't.....which is another game we need to prepare well for to win. This will not be some stepover game in which our starters are on the bench in the 3rd quarter.

  9. #45

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajunsmike View Post
    I am one who enjoys listening to Scott talk about the NBA. There are others besides me as well.
    Me too. Enjoy the NBA talk because I watch the NBA, in particular the Pelicans. Funny thing is that many of the people who complain about the NBA talk are those that would rather call in and talk about baseball which is like watching paint dry.

  10. #46

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    One thing that he ignores in his rant is what McNeese has done against FBS competition the last 4 or 5 years.

    Of course, the past doesn't mean much. This is a new McNeese team with different players, new coaching staff, new QB, some inexperienced offensive linemen and some players that will sitting out suspensions for the game.

    It doesn't look good for us.

    Doc


  11. #47

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    Quote Originally Posted by McNeese72 View Post
    One thing that he ignores in his rant is what McNeese has done against FBS competition the last 4 or 5 years.

    Of course, the past doesn't mean much. This is a new McNeese team with different players, new coaching staff, new QB, some inexperienced offensive linemen and some players that will sitting out suspensions for the game.

    It doesn't look good for us.

    Doc
    And we have too many question.. New Qb, O line, a talented ( at least on paper ) secondary. ANd then there's Hud. Will he be the "enlightened" Hud or the die by the self indulged belief that his way is right (see Les Miles). As for the Boise game, well i'm not buying it. After we got smacked by the razorbacks when we all thought we stood a chance, my money is on the same team that gets skull drugged . Hud has to prove me wrong.

  12. #48

    Default Re: 103.7 Dave Schultz McNeese Rant!

    We are in no position to overlook anybody, especially a team that won 10 games last year.


Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 19
    Last Post: April 4th, 2020, 09:28 pm
  2. Replies: 39
    Last Post: March 1st, 2016, 12:16 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •