Hudspeth: UL quarterback battle now 'a three-man race'

[Turbine]

Exactly....as a matter of fact I believe I'll just embrace U La La.....

Only after touchdowns and victories.

[Jeaux]

----accurately----no the better of the 2---threw for more tds than interceptions and no question of the pressure it put on defenses with the zone read----read scheme!!!

Boomer, what the scheme called when you got a 3rd and long, backed up in your endzone, seconds to go before the half and you throw a duck that the opposing team can intercept. Is that the no read scheme or the I didn't really want to win anyways scheme.

[CajunEXPRESS]

accurately

no the better of the 2---threw for more tds than interceptions and no question of the pressure it put on defenses with the zone read

read scheme!!!

Whatever.

Pressure on defense pure conjecture on your part.

The stats I see says you're wrong. 61% vs 53%
121 vs 111 rating. 1400 plus yard vs 1200 plus yards. In ten not 11 games.



Give me a link on stats you're claiming.

[Boomer]

Whatever.

Pressure on defense pure conjecture on your part.

The stats I see says you're wrong. 61% vs 53%
121 vs 111 rating. 1400 plus yard vs 1200 plus yards. In ten not 11 games.



Give me a link on stats you're claiming.

----Oh now you want me to do your research---Look in last season's stats!!!----Any idea why the world is running the zone read?

[CajunEXPRESS]

Oh now you want me to do your research---Look in last season's stats!!!

Any idea why the world is running the zone read?

I did. Listed them for ya dude. Read

[Boomer]

I did. Listed them for ya dude. Read

---As I and others have pointed out on here --you don't read, interject words, and misinterpret posts----You asked for the stats ---No welfare on here remember ---go look it up!!!! just follow your own rules!!!

[CajunEXPRESS]

---As I and others have pointed out on here --you don't read, interject words, and misinterpret posts

You asked for the stats ---No welfare on here remember ---go look it up!!!! just follow your own rules!!!

Are you blind. I gave you the stats. 61% vs 53%, 121 rating vs 111 rating. 1400 plus yards vs 1200 plus yards in one less game.

Yeah Hack was more productive, more accurate.

[Boomer]

Are you blind. I gave you the stats. 61% vs 53%, 121 rating vs 111 rating. 1400 plus yards vs 1200 plus yards in one less game.

Yeah Hack was more productive, more accurate.

---You questioned the more interceptions than TDs----and asked for the link----Go READ your posts---

[ManAboutTown]

---You questioned the more interceptions than TDs

and asked for the link

Go READ your posts---

Nixon is not a QB, Boomer. FFS, give it up.

[CajunEXPRESS]

---You questioned the more interceptions than TDs

and asked for the link

Go READ your posts---

No, I said you pushed for the less accurate QB. Then you started Mumbo-jumbo about TD/interception ratio. Both sample too small to hang your hat on. Then I posted accuracy and efficiency ratio as well as yards.

He's a RB Boomer not a QB.

Regardless I pray we never need him as QB period.