Pre season has 3 teams from the Belt and 3 from the CUSA in the top 65---in the over 100s Belt has 6 and CUSA 8--0--Pretty even rankings but who would have thought Ga S and Appy to be our top 2???
Pre season has 3 teams from the Belt and 3 from the CUSA in the top 65---in the over 100s Belt has 6 and CUSA 8--0--Pretty even rankings but who would have thought Ga S and Appy to be our top 2???
Nobody who knew NCAA football thought they would be easy.
Boomer it was never about the two schools. It's about us being with FCS schools again and again. Quit your screwed up memory.
You are the only person who was trolling. I never said anything bad about either school. The FACTS are many UL fans are not happy to be associated with FCS move ups instead of most schools in CUSA and AAC.
Boomer, we are not only stuck in this sh-it conference our idiot leaders embrace it. There never will be a day that I will giggle and smile about being in the SBC, much less fourth in the SBC behind FCS move ups. As for the conference overall, Georgia State, USA, TxSt, Troy, ULMost, CC,not even talking about the soon to be gone NMSU, and Idaho, is pretty much how I rate a conference. How good are the weaklings?
Not a laughing matter, not a time to offer t-jo olive branches. Giggle while we watch the Tigue mired i intrigue. No, Boomer, I'm not smoking a peace pipe with your blow buddies t-jo, and FarmerBROWN.
if some of the ones who left had stayed, that coupled with the new additions, would it truly be so bad a conference? I believe if teams (err schools) worked together they could have built something, rather than some having bailed. on field and in classroom accomplishments should be weighed higher than market and budget. as much as some may be tired and distruPleasel of the SEC narrative, I do give them credit that they stick together.(unfortunately they go too far and stick together at all cost)... all that is needed is a level playing field, transparent processes and consistent application of the rules
If, if, if, coulda, woulda, shoulda. We are what we are. Regardless of who left or stayed we should always be positioning and working to be in a better conference. That is the only thing that makes sense in a power consolidating NCAA structure.
When your leaders actively work against the best interest of the teams, coaches, and supporters you have to wonder what is their motivation? Perhaps personal gain?
Personal gain= protecting big donors from possible others, I.E. big fish small pond. protecting media contracts instead of actively brand distribution. protecting your pension as president. protecting your bling job as an inept AD.
but if the conference becomes better, we then are in a better conference. it is hard to build the success with one foot out of the door. I don't think any conference should ever admit defeat and not try to improve
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)