Again, you overstate so much to make your point. When did I say they suck? This whole debate started from me mentioning that they didn't have a ton of talent in relation to the rest of the SBC and did not get separation from DB's. Our RAC, Pass yards per play and overall passing numbers were all down the last two years and I could physically see that our receivers had a tough time getting space from defensive backs to make catches and extend plays. I did not say they sucked. I said they were not game changers like previous sets of receivers we've had.
BTW, what will you call "good" WR play? I just need to know. Based on recent arguments, their lack of production did not stem from lack of talent, it stemmed from everything else from bad coaching to Scott Farmer. Therefore, I'd assume if you see some really good production there, we would have to attribute it to coaching right?