The University of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns would be prohibited but Louisiana Ragin Cajuns is not. Read the law again and try to comprehend.
The University of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns would be prohibited but Louisiana Ragin Cajuns is not. Read the law again and try to comprehend.
I know. I know. Everyone thinks they are a lawyer.
Good question, why was that law written?
It's because when the Judge observed "no law says you can change your name" (and used it as a basis of denial) he exposed the fact that no law said they couldn't change their name.
The solution of course was to hurriedly write a retroactive law stating they couldn't.
Back to your question; By the spirit and intent of this law, all references pertained to "University of" they were hyper specific that it was "University of" that engaged the law.
This went far beyond no law says you can/no law says you can't. This law narrowed the scope to the pinpoint detail "University of"
The city designation was irrelevant if "University of" was not used.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)