Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 61 to 72 of 99

Thread: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

  1. #61

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    At least the defense made plays......They played well enough in games but you are right, we had no offense and thus, spent way too much time on the field.
    Well what you state is like a double-edged sword. Don't forget, the defense can get off of the field if they stop the other teams offense!

  2. #62

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by Duggie35 View Post
    Well what you state is like a double-edged sword. Don't forget, the defense can get off of the field if they stop the other teams offense!
    Not if they have to stop the other team 60 times.

  3. #63

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by Duggie35 View Post
    Well what you state is like a double-edged sword. Don't forget, the defense can get off of the field if they stop the other teams offense!
    And then you are right back on when your offense sputters or turns the ball over...... At some point, fatigue is an issue when you are giving up 70+ snaps in a game.

  4. #64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    And then you are right back on when your offense sputters or turns the ball over...... At some point, fatigue is an issue when you are giving up 70+ snaps in a game.
    Yep. And I'll go even further and say in our league and most of college football in general, you have to have a good offense to win most games. There aren't many shut down defenses in college football. If you have one forcing a few punts a game and holding the other team to field goals a couple times a game, that should be good enough if your offense takes care of business.

  5. #65

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappDaddy View Post
    Yep. And I'll go even further and say in our league and most of college football in general, you have to have a good offense to win most games. There aren't many shut down defenses in college football. If you have one forcing a few punts a game and holding the other team to field goals a couple times a game, that should be good enough if your offense takes care of business.
    We averaged 26 points a game this past year. That's down from 2014 where our offense was considered to be a disappointment by most standards and it was, by far, the worst we've put up since Hud has been here. Obviously that would mean that we would, on average, have to hold our opponents to under roughly 25 points per game just to have a net positive in point differential and we have not accomplished that type of defensive output for an entire season as long as I can remember. The defense was far from great but it wasn't the reason we got trounced by La Tech, App State and Troy and Akron

  6. #66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    We averaged 26 points a game this past year. That's down from 2014 where our offense was considered to be a disappointment by most standards and it was, by far, the worst we've put up since Hud has been here. Obviously that would mean that we would, on average, have to hold our opponents to under roughly 25 points per game just to have a net positive in point differential and we have not accomplished that type of defensive output for an entire season as long as I can remember. The defense was far from great but it wasn't the reason we got trounced by La Tech, App State and Troy and Akron
    I agree with you. My point was that the offense did not do it's job. The defense could have been better bit we've had much worse in the last decade.

  7. Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    They were on the field because they couldn't hold on third and any yard.


  8. #68

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS View Post
    They were on the field because they couldn't hold on third and any yard.
    Last two seasons I preferred seeing the Cajun D in a 3rd and 4 rather than a 3rd and 15.

  9. #69
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS View Post
    They were on the field because they couldn't hold on third and any yard.
    True. But last year the defense was back on the field in under a minute because our offensive coaching sucked (recruiting, assessing, teaching, conditioning, discipline, adjusting, thinking, applying common sense, etc).

    But there's always the "next year" after the "down year". There's always the "back to great year" after the "anamoly year"... or so they tell me.

  10. #70
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by axg8750 View Post
    Last two seasons I preferred seeing the Cajun D in a 3rd and 4 rather than a 3rd and 15.
    Your preference skills are solid.

  11. #71
    Ragin4U's Avatar Ragin4U is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    Your preference skills are solid.
    But on 3rd and 4, they only gave up 5 yards. 3rd and 15 they gave up 16.

    The issue last year was on both sides of the ball. Yall are exactly correct. The offense did the D no favors by going 3 and out so often. The D did the offense no favors by needing them to score in the 30s and 40s to win a game. We need to see improvement in all phases this year or it will be another ugly one.

  12. #72

    Default Re: Hudspeth in no hurry to name a starting quarterback

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragin4U View Post
    But on 3rd and 4, they only gave up 5 yards. 3rd and 15 they gave up 16.

    The issue last year was on both sides of the ball. Yall are exactly correct. The offense did the D no favors by going 3 and out so often. The D did the offense no favors by needing them to score in the 30s and 40s to win a game. We need to see improvement in all phases this year or it will be another ugly one.
    What was the score against App State?

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 141
    Last Post: August 16th, 2016, 08:16 am
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 14th, 2016, 12:30 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 20th, 2015, 11:30 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •