New York Post uses University of Louisiana :-)

[CajunRed]

Or I can say humans dont enhance it and that is that.

Seems pretty simple. Increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere line up pretty well with increased global temps.

Then what was the cause before green house gases?

If I say that we'd be covered in a glacier as part of a new ice age IF NOT for the effects/benefits from human activity, wouldn't you ask me to prove it?

[Ragin4U]

Greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere are normal. Present levels of greenhouse gasses are not.
We need the greenhouse effect or the Earth would be too cold for life. But to continue to add those gasses could lead to a runaway greenhouse effect. See Venus.

[CajunRed]

"Could lead"? Shouldn't you be saying "will lead"?

[Ragin4U]

"Could" is correct. Not many 100% locks in science. Especially climate science. Earth processes and extremely dynamic and interdependent.

[ManAboutTown]

"Could" is correct. Not many 100% locks in science. Especially climate science. Earth processes and extremely dynamic and interdependent.

Not a lot of 100% locks in science? "100% locks" is the entire point of the scientific process...

[Ragin4U]

Not a lot of 100% locks in science? "100% locks" is the entire point of the scientific process...

Nope. Not even a little correct.

[CajunRed]

Al Gore is still laughing at all the "suckers" to whom he sold carbon credits for millions...while all the time he's flying around in a private jet...and just one of his houses uses more energy in a month than each of us does in a year. Nice gig if you can get it.

[Ragin4U]

Al made out like a bandit.

[ManAboutTown]

Nope. Not even a little correct.

You're trying to tell me that the scientific method was not meant to find facts and/or laws?

[Ragin4U]

A fact is an observation. A law is a description. A theory is an explanation.
The scientific method is a process to test a hypothesis.
There is no proof in science.

[ManAboutTown]

A fact is an observation. A law is a description. A theory is an explanation.
The scientific method is a process to test a hypothesis.
There is no proof in science.

Thanks for the clarification..
Red, I think he just proved your point for you.

[Ragin4U]

Thanks for the clarification..
Red, I think he just proved your point for you.

De nada for the edification.
Unsure about your second statement.