New York Post uses University of Louisiana :-)

[CajunRed]

Another interesting current effect of Earth's ever changing climate.

http://m.phys.org/news/2016-04-nasa-global-earth.html

Are you freakin kidding me. They never cease to amaze.

I wonder if that wobble was impacted by all the prior times in history when the earth's temps warmed or cooled...or just this time.

I can just see the new t-shirts now -- "Help protect the wobble"

[Turbine]

This just in! Older scientist at A&M Colleges across the country are reporting trouble keeping their balance.

Their observations are attributed to earths new found wobble, reports the Bearings Straight News.

[Turbine]

PS I try to make everyone happy.

I cut my grass with a battery operated lawnmower, charged from an electrical plant operated on Natural Gas.

[Just1More]

PS I try to make everyone happy.

I cut my grass with a battery operated lawnmower, charged from an electrical plant operated on Natural Gas.

How do you figure that's keeping "everyone" happy. First, green freaks don't think grass should be cut at all. Their close cousins think only grazing animals should "cut it". You, my friend, are cutting your grass with the combination of 150 petroleum derived products. Your attempt at "going green" is only a thimble full of green paint in a vat of crude oil. LOL

[Boomer]

How do you figure that's keeping "everyone" happy. First, green freaks don't think grass should be cut at all. Their close cousins think only grazing animals should "cut it". You, my friend, are cutting your grass with the combination of 150 petroleum derived products. Your attempt at "going green" is only a thimble full of green paint in a vat of crude oil. LOL

---I am not familiar at all with the legal events of the Oil spill but just wondering if any of these people who were mentioned with the gloom and doom scenarios were lawyered up for the trials---again I have no idea but know, as everybody else, that there were some huge payouts !!!

[Just1More]

---I am not familiar at all with the legal events of the Oil spill but just wondering if any of these people who were mentioned with the gloom and doom scenarios were lawyered up for the trials---again I have no idea but know, as everybody else, that there were some huge payouts !!!

Massive numbers of people were paid for no losses at all. But it's called cutting your losses and moving on. Civil trials never go well for the oil giants. Huge mistakes were made, a massive cleanup required, but denying the individuals that were damaged wasn't worth readjusting the damage claims.

And no, just like with climate science, you will not see law suits against scientists for theorizing cause and effect incorrectly, or for theorizing consequences incorrectly. They provide their massive science study... nothing of which can anyone but another scientist in that massively fragmented component of climate science understand... and then as they're either paid directly, or strongly encouraged to give opinions, they weave the science together with their opinion and postulate. It is the latter that I find disturbing. It is also irresponsible for a biologist, or a molecular physicist, or a geophysist, or a bontanist, or a chemist, or even a meteorologist, to call themself a "climate change expert"... but that isn't stopping them. As they jointly produce fragments of data, and they get together and share, they ought to be infinitely more cautious on drawing conclusions. As I said prior, there are massive global consequences, politically, if they are off by any slight order of magnitude on about 10 factors involving climate theory. But politicians want the political juice this topic delivers... and for reasons I find disturbing... science has chosen sides politically. I actually know why... but it's a damning accusation on science that I just don't want to believe.

[Turbine]

How do you figure that's keeping "everyone" happy. First, green freaks don't think grass should be cut at all. Their close cousins think only grazing animals should "cut it". You, my friend, are cutting your grass with the combination of 150 petroleum derived products. Your attempt at "going green" is only a thimble full of green paint in a vat of crude oil. LOL

I eat it.

[Just1More]

I hope that the current research is flawed, inflated, just plain wrong but I really dont think it is. I lean more towards the middle of most things and do on climate science as well. I think we are adding to global warming but I'm not convinced it will be the end of the human race as some think.

I think you chose to step out of this topic... but I have to ask you a question. You've solidly defended the ethics of the scientists, and their skills, in drawing the pervasive conclusions (97% agree) on manmade climate change (not just minor change - but major change). They are saying that man is tinkering with the atmospheric incubator thermostat... to the peril of all mankind. But you added the above to your personal opinion on the subject. How can you say that you "lean toward the middle on this topic" at the same time you seem to place your faith in these "climate science" experts? In reality, there are few, if any, climate science experts. There are many disparate science experts studying fragments of data that contribute to the science of climate. But again, how can you defend these persons of science, but say that as they've drawn together in a 97% consensus, you "fall in the middle" on the subject? What is "the middle"? To me, there is no middle. I could care less about taking the extreme political viewpoints and adjusting to a pleasant "can we all get along" "middle". This is a science subject. And there is no middle. Science needs to provide definitive information. Let it land on the place it belongs. But "middle science" is no such thing.

[basinbear]

How do you figure that's keeping "everyone" happy. First, green freaks don't think grass should be cut at all. Their close cousins think only grazing animals should "cut it". You, my friend, are cutting your grass with the combination of 150 petroleum derived products. Your attempt at "going green" is only a thimble full of green paint in a vat of crude oil. LOL

Grazing animals can't cut your grass.....to many farts...

[Just1More]

Grazing animals can't cut your grass.....to many farts...

Fartologists are at the top of the climatology food chain.