Louisiana vs Cal Irvine

[Zeebart21]

No mid major designation in the 80s. Point is mute.
Ask Patrick Ewing, Xavier McDaniel or doc rivers if we were a mid major power? We gotta stop defending mediocrity. Does your job allow for half assness?

[CajunNation]

We were a team of mid-major quality with Ship.

We were almost there with Pascal, Marty and Jesse.

We are far from it today.

[ZoomZoom]

And you have to take this into consideration. Be it the MAC, WAC, or SWAC...they, like us, are considered mid majors. PC for "all you others." Mid major teams will get a five year run, coach leaves, cycle starts over. We had a chance at our little run to continue or build, but shooting failed us for whatever reason this year.

CN is right. We're light years from where we once were. Game has changed a lot and it's hit or miss. I posted a link to stats yesterday. Hedge was one that looked good on the floor but on stat sheet, eh, so so.

[Turbine]

No mid major designation in the 80s. Point is mute.

Mid Major, the original less money phrase for legit D1 teams.

The next attempt to slow financial viscosity was called BCS.

The latest attempt is P5 and G5.

It started with basketball with goals.

[CajunT]

I should have waited to read your response. You nailed it. We weren't a PMM... but if you break it down to HMM, QMM, and LMM... we were a QMM with Paschal. Quality Mid Major.

I think we're now a FMM. A Fishy Mid Major. We can bait the hook, we can catch some small throwbacks all day long, but when we get a big one on the line... our line breaks. When we miss out on the big offshore tournament, we aren't that bad in a cane pole pond tournament. We don't end up with the biggest stringer... but we catch enough to stink up a skillet. Yep... we are a FMM.

No Matt, there are days were your post on the only thing worth visiting RP for.

[mahtoo]

34% of the outcomes we're subject to that compare unfavorably to our past are due to a trend that reduces the ability of programs/conferences of our status from rising up and out of that status. 66% of what compares unfavorably to our greatest efforts of yesteryear is our coaching/recruiting.

Coach Marlin is a solid man, running a clean program. He's a good to very good defensive coach. He's a fair to good offensive coach. He's not an across the board good recruiting head coach. I think his offensive coaching is hampered by his recruiting limitations. Talent is king in basketball. I think he can identify talent as good as anyone. I don't think he has the personality to recruit better than he has. I'd like the school to either help him know what he needs to add to his recruiting staff, or force a recruiting person on him as a condition of him keeping his job. The alternative to that is to cut him loose.

But the 34% fact in paragraph one, and the difficulty of finding a better replacement should not be taken lightly. We also have to consider that our AD doesn't get all that cranky about mediocrity, and will play a big part in selecting Marlin's successor.

Agree. I think most of us agree that we've had better coaches and that we've had worse. Your last paragraph speaks volumes and it scares me to think of what could happen.

[ZoomZoom]

Agree. I think most of us agree that we've had better coaches and that we've had worse. Your last paragraph speaks volumes and it scares me to think of what could happen.

Like the basketball version of Coach Toothpick?

[VObserver]

Like the baskerball version of Coach Toothpick?

In terms of success, though not personality, we had him in WBB. Mr. Rogers' neighborhood was very win-deprived.

[mahtoo]

Like the baskerball version of Coach Toothpick?

He was chewing on one in the first TV interview I ever saw him do. I remember thinking to myself "Man we're in trouble".

For us to hire an established head coach with a winning record, I think we would have to pay more than we're paying Marlin. How many of those guys are there that would be willing to come here? With the budget what it is, I don't think the admin would be willing to pay what it would take to get that type coach. That would mean taking a chance on an up and comer type coach.

Having said that I'm of the opinion that we should move on from Marlin after his current contract expires, and I admit we might be worse off by doing so.

[VObserver]

We were a team of mid-major quality with Ship.

We were almost there with Pascal, Marty and Jesse.

We are far from it today.

Once we moved to D1, we were a high major with Shipley. Mid majors don't make the cover of SI as "The team with the most realistic chance to beat UCLA".

Some of our post Shipley teams could also be considered majors. Mid majors don't beat #1 Georgetown with Patrick Ewing, or beat Kentucky at Rupp Arena.

You are certainly correct that Robert Lee and Bob Marlin have coached us out of any resemblance to those teams.