Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 37 to 38 of 38

Thread: UL's Marlin miffed over NCAA Tournament mid-major snubs

  1. #37

    Default Re: UL's Marlin miffed over NCAA Tournament mid-major snubs

    I think mid major coaches are part of the solution. I have long thought the better mid majors need to schedule each other. Over time I think the product of more schools would improve, as well as recruiting. Nail biting, gut wrenching games would probably attract more fans. If more mid majors are really good, as a block they would have more influence. Maybe then they could push for a limit of schools per conference invited.

    All season I've heard very negative words about the basketball program. Who would want to go to the Cajundome after hearing all this feedback? Is next year's team going to be any better?

    I think mid majors like UL, with better than average interest in this sport in their region, must put their heads together and raise the bar of mid major basketball.

    I think mid major coaches and their schools refuse to try something new. If no bold measures are taken, what you see is what you're going to get next year, and next decade for that matter. Are we any better off than what Jessie Evans left behind? Or Fletcher? Or Paschal? Or Shipley?

    Mid major basketball needs a stimulus.

    I am not singling out any one coach or school.


  2. #38

    Default Re: UL's Marlin miffed over NCAA Tournament mid-major snubs

    Quote Originally Posted by California Cajun View Post
    I think mid major coaches are part of the solution. I have long thought the better mid majors need to schedule each other. Over time I think the product of more schools would improve, as well as recruiting. Nail biting, gut wrenching games would probably attract more fans. If more mid majors are really good, as a block they would have more influence. Maybe then they could push for a limit of schools per conference invited.

    All season I've heard very negative words about the basketball program. Who would want to go to the Cajundome after hearing all this feedback? Is next year's team going to be any better?

    I think mid majors like UL, with better than average interest in this sport in their region, must put their heads together and raise the bar of mid major basketball.

    I think mid major coaches and their schools refuse to try something new. If no bold measures are taken, what you see is what you're going to get next year, and next decade for that matter. Are we any better off than what Jessie Evans left behind? Or Fletcher? Or Paschal? Or Shipley?

    Mid major basketball needs a stimulus.

    I am not singling out any one coach or school.
    "We have met the enemy and he is us"

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NCAA Softball Committee Snubs
    By NewsCopy in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: May 18th, 2019, 07:02 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •