Melrock has the correct main reason for batting first. It allows your hitters 7 innings to bat which is good experience early in the season. Also some games end early due to the "mercy" rule. You get at least 5 innings to hit in those situations. Note when conference play begins, the home team does bat second.
Sorry, Mike has won more games than you and combined, I will go with his opinion. I think it is the right one to get the team seasoned.
Lets say we run rule 10 teams in the non conference schedule, that as a minimum of 30 less at bats and would say probably closer to 60 or 100. That last at bat is when some of the less know kids get to bat and show what they have against real competition. That game experience is invaluable for their development.
Last edited by MelRock; February 22nd, 2016 at 04:31 pm. Reason: No bulldogs were killed during this post and ULMost still sux!
So I've seen 3 good arguments for doing it:
1) Allows your potent offense to "jump" on an opponent early
2) Allows you to have an extra at bat if you're leading, which is valuable for player development at the plate
3) Gets your team ready for playing on the road where you will have to bat first
Something about on a neutral field the team that scores first wins most of the time.
I don't think you get a choice in a tournament.
Whatever his real reasoning is, its working! We need about 5 understudies to soak up his knowledge. Same thing with Robe. I would love to see Babb's notebook. haha
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)