Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: USA Today/NFCA Division I Coaches Poll

  1. #11

    Default Re: USA Today/NFCA Division I Coaches Poll

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS View Post
    To be highly successful we'll need sub 1.5 ERA. Two plus will work on many teams vs our explosive offense. No doubt about it we'll need better performance to get to the WCWS.
    It's nice but sub-1.50 is asking a lot. With the way offense has evolved in the whole sport, I dont think under 1.50 is a realistic target, especially considering how many power teams we play in the regular season and the improvement of the conference.

    Last year, there was 1 team in the nation with a sub-1.50 ERA and that was UCF. Sub-2.00 would be tremendous. 11 teams were sub-2.00, of which, 4 made it to the WCWS. We were actually #20 nationally in Team ERA.

    To be honest, it really just ends up coming down to the draw.

    We've had 5 seasons under Mike with a sub-1.50 ERA out of 14 years and the last time was 2009. If you look at those 6 years since, we've only been under a 2.00 ERA once in that time frame (2011). That 2011 team was the only one that didn't make it to at least a Super over those last 6 years.

    Also a side note, the WCWS team in 2014 had the worst team ERA in that 6 year span by a decent margin with a 2.75 ERA. Logically you would think they had to be, in turn, one of the higher avg hitting teams but that's not the case (.302 avg). 2014 was our worst team ERA and 2nd worst team Batting Average in the last 6 years and made the WCWS.

  2. #12

    Default Re: USA Today/NFCA Division I Coaches Poll

    Quote Originally Posted by wcd35 View Post
    It's nice but sub-1.50 is asking a lot. With the way offense has evolved in the whole sport, I dont think under 1.50 is a realistic target, especially considering how many power teams we play in the regular season and the improvement of the conference.

    Last year, there was 1 team in the nation with a sub-1.50 ERA and that was UCF. Sub-2.00 would be tremendous. 11 teams were sub-2.00, of which, 4 made it to the WCWS. We were actually #20 nationally in Team ERA.

    To be honest, it really just ends up coming down to the draw.

    We've had 5 seasons under Mike with a sub-1.50 ERA out of 14 years and the last time was 2009. If you look at those 6 years since, we've only been under a 2.00 ERA once in that time frame (2011). That 2011 team was the only one that didn't make it to at least a Super over those last 6 years.

    Also a side note, the WCWS team in 2014 had the worst team ERA in that 6 year span by a decent margin with a 2.75 ERA. Logically you would think they had to be, in turn, one of the higher avg hitting teams but that's not the case (.302 avg). 2014 was our worst team ERA and 2nd worst team Batting Average in the last 6 years and made the WCWS.
    Last year only 11 players had a sub 1.50 ERA. Another 25 had sub 2.00 ERA's. The game has definitely evolved in the past 15 years to be much more offensive minded. New ball's, bats, and moving back the pitchers mound have all contributed. I also think the training, players, and coaching have helped to increase the offensive output.

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun90 View Post
    Last year only 11 players had a sub 1.50 ERA. Another 25 had sub 2.00 ERA's. The game has definitely evolved in the past 15 years to be much more offensive minded. New ball's, bats, and moving back the pitchers mound have all contributed. I also think the training, players, and coaching have helped to increase the offensive output.
    And I wish they would move the pitcher back another couple feet. I'd like this for the safety of the pitcher and because it might produce a little more offense. I also wish they would rewrite the rule about pitchers staying in the lane perhaps allowing more angles giving pitchers a little new advantage to make up for extra footage to the plate.

  4. #14

    Default Re: USA Today/NFCA Division I Coaches Poll

    Quote Originally Posted by oldalum View Post
    And I wish they would move the pitcher back another couple feet. I'd like this for the safety of the pitcher and because it might produce a little more offense. I also wish they would rewrite the rule about pitchers staying in the lane perhaps allowing more angles giving pitchers a little new advantage to make up for extra footage to the plate.

    damn...how much more offense do we need in this game LOL

  5. #15

    Default Re: USA Today/NFCA Division I Coaches Poll

    Quote Originally Posted by BirdofParadise View Post
    damn...how much more offense do we need in this game LOL
    Eight runs per game average just not enough.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. UL Softball Ranked in Top Ten of USA Today/NFCA Coaches Poll
    By NewsCopy in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 29th, 2020, 11:50 am
  2. Louisiana favored to win SBC division in coaches' poll
    By NewsCopy in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 18th, 2019, 02:40 pm
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: January 31st, 2017, 05:51 pm
  4. NFCA/USA Today poll 3/12/13
    By lcitsh in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 12th, 2013, 11:58 am
  5. Louisiana climbs to #14 in USA Today/NFCA Top 25 Poll
    By NewsCopy in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 22nd, 2006, 05:17 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •