It's nice but sub-1.50 is asking a lot. With the way offense has evolved in the whole sport, I dont think under 1.50 is a realistic target, especially considering how many power teams we play in the regular season and the improvement of the conference.
Last year, there was 1 team in the nation with a sub-1.50 ERA and that was UCF. Sub-2.00 would be tremendous. 11 teams were sub-2.00, of which, 4 made it to the WCWS. We were actually #20 nationally in Team ERA.
To be honest, it really just ends up coming down to the draw.
We've had 5 seasons under Mike with a sub-1.50 ERA out of 14 years and the last time was 2009. If you look at those 6 years since, we've only been under a 2.00 ERA once in that time frame (2011). That 2011 team was the only one that didn't make it to at least a Super over those last 6 years.
Also a side note, the WCWS team in 2014 had the worst team ERA in that 6 year span by a decent margin with a 2.75 ERA. Logically you would think they had to be, in turn, one of the higher avg hitting teams but that's not the case (.302 avg). 2014 was our worst team ERA and 2nd worst team Batting Average in the last 6 years and made the WCWS.