Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 96

Thread: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

  1. UL Football Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    UL coach Mark Hudspeth offers more details on promised changes in 2016 for his struggling offense




  2. #2

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    They way I am reading into this is hud wants to go back to a true dual threat QB. JD, Dion Ray, any one know if the Weaver kid fits the true dual threat mold? I haven't paid much attention to him.


  3. #3

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Yes


  4. #4

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    what kind of speed weaver has ? I view him as a kolton browning type. Not slow but deceptive speed.


  5. Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Back to a true "dual threat"? When did he ever leave the dual threat mentality? He never committed to Haack.


  6. #6
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by ManAboutTown View Post
    Back to a true "dual threat"? When did he ever leave the dual threat mentality? He never committed to Haack.
    It's smoke and mirrors. We have absolutely no need whatsoever of implementing a "new offense".

  7. #7

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    "New offense" isn't what I got out of that, build offense around what we have like when we got here is what I read. We don't have Harris, Broadway and the o-line to run what we ran for the last 2 years...(which is what has been pretty obvious to everyone else) I think s d hope the offense will look closer to year 1 than year 4, our roster does.


  8. #8

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    It's smoke and mirrors. We have absolutely no need whatsoever of implementing a "new offense".
    Grasping at straws is more like it. It's easy to say all the right things. It's a lot tougher to rip the teams chest open to find out why the heart isn't beating right.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    He tried going back to a true dual threat offense when he named Nixon the starting QB. Wasnt that the whole point of doing so?


  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RaisingCajun08 View Post
    He tried going back to a true dual threat offense when he named Nixon the starting QB. Wasnt that the whole point of doing so?
    I don't know because Nixon isn't a duel threat

  11. #11

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    I don't know because Nixon isn't a duel threat
    Exactly! Nixon was never a dual threat QB.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Hudspeth gets more specific on offensive changes

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    I don't know because Nixon isn't a duel threat
    I would not call Nixon a dual threat. But if you ask Hud, he would say that he is.

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Hudspeth doesn't run from UL's offensive woes
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: October 19th, 2016, 12:57 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 15th, 2015, 12:55 am
  3. Hudspeth contemplates Jaguars' offensive options
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 28th, 2014, 09:15 pm
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 16th, 2013, 02:15 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •