Haack to start; both QBs to play

[ManAboutTown]

Sure thing. I still want Farmer gone...and I'd like for Hud to catch his head. Does that suffice Barrister? Does that make me less of a fan? Am I not allowed to change my mind based on new evidence? How anyone can be anything but skeptical of the Hud we are seeing in year 5, especially in light of his glaring weaknesses in years 2,3, & 4, is beyond me. I hope my admission helps. It sure ain't making our ____ing team any better...now is it?

I've infamously questioned Hud since the Florida game, with some trepidation (understanding the fact that I may just be mad about the outcome, not the process of that game, which can blur objectivity) and gotten crushed for it. When I and a few others started really asking the tough questions after LaTech in 2014, I got crushed for it.

Some of my biggest critics from back then and even as recently as this season have since messaged, called and emailed with a different opinion. People are noticing.

You can fool joe blow who follows the team casually, just happy to be out of the house. You can even fool smart fans for a few years. It's only a matter of time before people that truly follow the team and have a little bit of knowledge start catching on..

[ManAboutTown]

Nm

[duggie85]

Is Hud not stealing our money?

Did it even take 24 hours to prove my point?

https://forumeus.com/...924#post857924

[duggie85]

I've infamously questioned Hud since the Florida game, with some trepidation (understanding the fact that I may just be mad about the outcome, not the process of that game, which can blur objectivity) and gotten crushed for it. When I and a few others started really asking the tough questions after LaTech in 2014, I got crushed for it.

Some of my biggest critics from back then and even as recently as this season have since messaged, called and emailed with a different opinion. People are noticing.

You can fool joe blow who follows the team casually, just happy to be out of the house. You can even fool smart fans for a few years. It's only a matter of time before people that truly follow the team and have a little bit of knowledge start catching on..

You have been pretty vocal the last several months. And you make alot of good points.

But what I don't get is, is that during your petition glory days, you REPEATEDLY stated "Just ask Hudspeth who he wants...Ask Hud behind closed doors who he wants hired."

Why did you value his input so much for who should be the most important hire in UL Athletics history, the RCAF E.D., yet you have been questioning his decisions since 2012??

[cajunhawk]

Did it even take 24 hours to prove my point?

https://forumeus.com/...924#post857924

What's your point? Or do we even care anymore?

[cajunhawk]

You have been pretty vocal the last several months. And you make alot of good points.

But what I don't get is, is that during your petition glory days, you REPEATEDLY stated "Just ask Hudspeth who he wants...Ask Hud behind closed doors who he wants hired."

Why did you value his input so much for who should be the most important hire in UL Athletics history, the RCAF E.D., yet you have been questioning his decisions since 2012??

Because outside of coaching, Hudspeth is a very aggressive fundraiser for this team because he had to be. This has nothing to do with coaching.

[duggie85]

Because outside of coaching, Hudspeth is a very aggressive fundraiser for this team because he had to be. This has nothing to do with coaching.

First off Paul Blart, I wasn't asking you.

Second, now you're arguing that Hudspeth is a great fundraiser?? What happened to "he lied to us" nonsense you spew??? Everything Hud has used to fundraise has been purely based on future on-field results. Everything. He states he needs money so we can do x, we need more money so we can do y.

Is he a thief or not?

[cajunhawk]

First off Paul Blart, I wasn't asking you.

Second, now you're arguing that Hudspeth is a great fundraiser?? What happened to "he lied to us" nonsense you spew??? Everything Hud has used to fundraise has been purely based on future on-field results. Everything. He states he needs money so we can do x, we need more money so we can do y.

Is he a thief or not?

Regardless of whether he lied to us or not...he raised the money. Regardless of whether he is worth the money we pay him...he raised the money. Regardless of whether your pop culture references suck...he raised the money. You seem to be slamming your head into a wall just to prove a point, that I already admitted to.

[duggie85]

Regardless of whether he lied to us or not...he raised the money. Regardless of whether he is worth the money we pay him...he raised the money. Regardless of whether your pop culture references suck...he raised the money. You seem to be slamming your head into a wall just to prove a point, that I already admitted to.

Hawk, you interjected yourself, as usual, into something that wasn't even directed towards you. Now how is that me slamming my head into a wall?