Yes, I agree that Haack's numbers were not great this past Saturday. BUT he gave the team a spark and won the game.
As far as the numbers from the other games, I already broke that down in another thread. Numbers can be skewed. In my other post looking at numbers only, I could argue that Haack was a better runner and Nixon was a better passer. We both know that is not the case.
When comparing strengths, we all know each QB has their strengths. Nothing will ever make me believe that Nixon is just as good of a passer as Haack. Nothing will ever make me believe that Haack is just as good of a runner as Nixon.
I will still say that Haack is a better QB that Nixon. Nixon is no more than a great athlete trying to be a QB. Same point many others have made in many instances here.
If anyone wants a good laugh regarding skewing numbers, Google comedian "Bill Burr Statistics."
I would link it here, but I'm sure the language would be frowned upon.
Whatever happened to that trophy ULMoanRow commissioned for the victors. Not that I would display it. But it kind of disappeared once they started losing on a regular basis