Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 75

Thread: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

  1. #31

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    So.... Who's in charge of recruiting?


  2. Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Quote Originally Posted by ManAboutTown View Post
    Anytime I've disagreed with you is a good start..
    ---And the 10 in the list are??? We all await your reply!!!

  3. #33

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Hey lets focus on the team and program and not like the Dems wanting to know if the Repubs think the Feds should Regulate Fantasy Football! LMBO!


  4. #34

    This is so COOL Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Boomer, talk to Turbine about having pre-post music! Right before someone would read your post they would here P.O.D.'s hit, "Here Comes the Boom"! Awesome, baby!!!
    A must see Movie, with Kevin James!!!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=KkJvtczC9rc


  5. #35

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Quote Originally Posted by ManAboutTown View Post
    Actually, ppl should be paying attention more closely to what he says and read between the lines. A few days ago, he admitted to botching the QB situation (which many here have been saying since camp was the case) and now, for the second time this year during a game week, the team is off in la la land. Our star players are not going to class for goodness sake! They're telling you something fellas.. And I believe it's what we've been saying here all along - locker room problems. Attitude reflects leadership, and if you're reading between the lines, there's a lot of selfishness coming from Hudspeth. Not a wonder that the team is playing "me" football rather than "team" football.

    I'm sorry, it's just the facts.
    He didn't say he botched the QB decision. He said he might have pulled Brooks too soon but he's sticking with his decision that Nixon is the guy to lead this team. Had he botched it, he would have gone back to Haack immediately and given him his full endorsement. Some of those "people" you speak of have had a pro Haack agenda from day 1 and have even made claims comparing him to Delhomme which is not fair to Haack nor should that even be considered do to his very small sample size as a starter in his career thus far.

  6. #36

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    I still prefer Haak. Better are and accuracy, reads better, runs ok. Nixon the better runner, but is not accurate and either can hand off to Eli.


  7. #37

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    Does Robinson dropping a TD count? Robinson fumbling at the 10 count? Does riles dropping a first down in his hands count? How about the first TD at Kentucky? When Haack ran it in? He did everything asked of him against NWST. So you tell me what did brooks Haack do so bad to get yanked so quick? 2 pick 6's? Or was that Nixon? 2-17? Or was that Nixon?
    These are the same receivers you gave a full endorsement to in the preseason.Brooks didn't necessarily do anything "bad" to get yanked but he didn't do a whole hell of a lot that led our team to scoring points and lengthening drives either. That game you reference where Nixon looked bad (and he did at times), he also combined, by himself, for over 400 yards of offense and was really our own bright spot.

  8. #38

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Quote Originally Posted by DaddyCajun View Post
    I still prefer Haak. Better are and accuracy, reads better, runs ok. Nixon the better runner, but is not accurate and either can hand off to Eli.
    I have not found that Haack has made any more or better reads than Nixon. He seems fixated on his primary receiver as much, or more, as Nixon thus far. The bottom line is that with our limited receiving corp, we need an extra dimension as a QB that can move the chains and create points. Its certainly not all on Haack as our line and our receivers have been suspect and I think he could thrive in certain systems. The problem is that people think we have the personnel to run those systems and I don't think that's true.

  9. #39

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    You are probably more correct than me. There are just some times that I would have wished Haak would be the guy out there in those certain situations rather than Nixon. Like when Nixon is struggling from one quarter to the next, put in Haak, at least a few series! Let Nixon watch and get a new grasp on what is going on out there from the side lines then put him back in. A change of pace if not anything!


  10. #40

    Default Re: After lackluster practice, Cajuns get 'back on track'

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    I have not found that Haack has made any more or better reads than Nixon. He seems fixated on his primary receiver as much, or more, as Nixon thus far. The bottom line is that with our limited receiving corp, we need an extra dimension as a QB that can move the chains and create points. Its certainly not all on Haack as our line and our receivers have been suspect and I think he could thrive in certain systems. The problem is that people think we have the personnel to run those systems and I don't think that's true.
    He has always had tunnel vision and isn't what a pocket passer does.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 5th, 2017, 11:41 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 12th, 2014, 07:05 pm
  3. Bullpen back on track for Cajuns
    By NewsCopy in forum Baseball
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 18th, 2014, 10:30 pm
  4. Cajuns back on practice field
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 21st, 2010, 04:10 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •