So.... Who's in charge of recruiting?
So.... Who's in charge of recruiting?
Hey lets focus on the team and program and not like the Dems wanting to know if the Repubs think the Feds should Regulate Fantasy Football! LMBO!
Boomer, talk to Turbine about having pre-post music! Right before someone would read your post they would here P.O.D.'s hit, "Here Comes the Boom"! Awesome, baby!!!
A must see Movie, with Kevin James!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=KkJvtczC9rc
He didn't say he botched the QB decision. He said he might have pulled Brooks too soon but he's sticking with his decision that Nixon is the guy to lead this team. Had he botched it, he would have gone back to Haack immediately and given him his full endorsement. Some of those "people" you speak of have had a pro Haack agenda from day 1 and have even made claims comparing him to Delhomme which is not fair to Haack nor should that even be considered do to his very small sample size as a starter in his career thus far.
I still prefer Haak. Better are and accuracy, reads better, runs ok. Nixon the better runner, but is not accurate and either can hand off to Eli.
These are the same receivers you gave a full endorsement to in the preseason.Brooks didn't necessarily do anything "bad" to get yanked but he didn't do a whole hell of a lot that led our team to scoring points and lengthening drives either. That game you reference where Nixon looked bad (and he did at times), he also combined, by himself, for over 400 yards of offense and was really our own bright spot.
I have not found that Haack has made any more or better reads than Nixon. He seems fixated on his primary receiver as much, or more, as Nixon thus far. The bottom line is that with our limited receiving corp, we need an extra dimension as a QB that can move the chains and create points. Its certainly not all on Haack as our line and our receivers have been suspect and I think he could thrive in certain systems. The problem is that people think we have the personnel to run those systems and I don't think that's true.
You are probably more correct than me. There are just some times that I would have wished Haak would be the guy out there in those certain situations rather than Nixon. Like when Nixon is struggling from one quarter to the next, put in Haak, at least a few series! Let Nixon watch and get a new grasp on what is going on out there from the side lines then put him back in. A change of pace if not anything!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)