Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 45

Thread: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

  1. #25

    Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

    All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

    4x 9-4 is incredible.
    9-4 x 3

  2. #26

    Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

    All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

    4x 9-4 is incredible.
    Not sure I understand your post.

    Bustle went 6-5 in 2005.

    I can show you numbers, but virtually any service you use will show a significant decrease in strength of schedule form the Bustle years to the Hud years.

    This along with the change in the NOLA Bowl invite requirements account for ALL of the difference in records between the 2 coaches once Bustle had the schollys back up to near normal in 2005.

    Bustle rebuilt a program from nothing. Hudpseth inherited everything and was given an easier schedule to boot.

  3. Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by STLMOCAJUN View Post
    9-4 x 3
    Oooh, bust.

  4. #28

    Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

    All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

    4x 9-4 is incredible.
    It's not incredible. It's good. Against comparable or inferior opponents, 9-4 is good. It's not incredible. We had chances to have incredible seasons, and we failed because...I'll leave that one up to you...since you have all the answers.

  5. Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    Not sure I understand your post.

    Bustle went 6-5 in 2005.

    I can show you numbers, but virtually any service you use will show a significant decrease in strength of schedule form the Bustle years to the Hud years.

    This along with the change in the NOLA Bowl invite requirements account for ALL of the difference in records between the 2 coaches once Bustle had the schollys back up to near normal in 2005.

    Bustle rebuilt a program from nothing. Hudpseth inherited everything and was given an easier schedule to boot.
    We don't know what Bustle would have done with a 12th game in 2005 so he has to vacate the winning season.

    He was 6-5 in 2006 and lost his last game, then fired all his coaches, so he must agree with me.

  6. #30

    Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    We don't know what Bustle would have done with a 12th game in 2005 so he has to vacate the winning season.

    He was 6-5 in 2006 and lost his last game, then fired all his coaches, so he must agree with me.
    Didn't we just fire the entire defensive staff after a 9-4 season?

  7. Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    Didn't we just fire the entire defensive staff after a 9-4 season?
    Last year' DC was leaving for the NFL.

    Stewart's replacement went 9-4 as well.


    "Consistency"

  8. #32

    Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine View Post
    Last year' DC was leaving for the NFL.

    Stewart's replacement went 9-4 as well.


    "Consistency"
    I heard it on solid info he was fired before he took that job. Are gonna have to fire an entire offensive staff while still having an "incredible" season?

  9. Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    I heard it on solid info he was fired before he took that job. Are gonna have to fire an entire offensive staff while still having an "incredible" season?
    If the Florida school hadn't rescinded their offer he would already have been gone.

    Willis getting an NFL offer was a surprise, his departure was not.

  10. Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunhawk View Post
    This year an inferior Akron team beat us at Cajun Field. The only constant here is the coaching staff.
    ---Now C-Hawk--have you been checking you Massey stats??? Got to admit they have lost to only pretty damn good teams----Don't know about their being inferior as they are ranked about 10 spots ahead of us!!!

  11. #35

    Default Re: Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

    Akron is not inferior to us, since we lost to them. But they are still not a good team. That loss should never have happened.

    They "tricked" us...as did 3 other teams.


  12. #36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunNation View Post
    Not sure I understand your post.

    Bustle went 6-5 in 2005.

    I can show you numbers, but virtually any service you use will show a significant decrease in strength of schedule form the Bustle years to the Hud years.

    This along with the change in the NOLA Bowl invite requirements account for ALL of the difference in records between the 2 coaches once Bustle had the schollys back up to near normal in 2005.

    Bustle rebuilt a program from nothing. Hudpseth inherited everything and was given an easier schedule to boot.
    We got pounded by eastern michigan that year. They were and are one of the worst teams in D1. We beat some bad teams that year. How can you say they were better than our current schedule? Show me the numbers.

    MT, north texas, Troy? Those teams are not any better then or now than what we are playing in conference currently.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 9th, 2013, 08:15 pm
  2. Hudspeth warns Cajuns not to overlook Lamar
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 28th, 2012, 03:42 pm
  3. I was tricked into eating meat (and I liked it)
    By NewsCopy in forum Eats Acadiana
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 24th, 2010, 09:00 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •