Hudspeth warns against being tricked by ULM's record

[basinbear]

He must be in Boomer's corner. We are 4-2 based on our opponents play.

Now that there is funny......

[Turbine]

This year an inferior Akron team beat us at Cajun Field. The only constant here is the coaching staff.

9-4 X4 is pretty consistent and the best that has ever been.

[cajunhawk]

9-4 X4 is pretty consistent and the best that has ever been.

Using that metric can we compare the strength of schedule against some of our better years from the 80's? A rise in wins correlated with a stark decrease in quality of opponents.

[Turbine]

Using that metric can we compare the strength of schedule against some of our better years from the 80's? A rise in wins correlated with a stark decrease in quality of opponents.

Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

4x 9-4 is incredible.

[STLMOCAJUN]

Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

4x 9-4 is incredible.

9-4 x 3

[CajunNation]

Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

4x 9-4 is incredible.

Not sure I understand your post.

Bustle went 6-5 in 2005.

I can show you numbers, but virtually any service you use will show a significant decrease in strength of schedule form the Bustle years to the Hud years.

This along with the change in the NOLA Bowl invite requirements account for ALL of the difference in records between the 2 coaches once Bustle had the schollys back up to near normal in 2005.

Bustle rebuilt a program from nothing. Hudpseth inherited everything and was given an easier schedule to boot.

[Turbine]

9-4 x 3

Oooh, bust.

[cajunhawk]

Including the coach you refer to from the 1980's the only consistency the last 3 coaches before Hud displayed were symptoms ranging from paltry to severe inconsistency.

All three prior, had Hud type schedules at their own low points, yet none since 96 had gotten over .500

4x 9-4 is incredible.

It's not incredible. It's good. Against comparable or inferior opponents, 9-4 is good. It's not incredible. We had chances to have incredible seasons, and we failed because...I'll leave that one up to you...since you have all the answers.

[Turbine]

Not sure I understand your post.

Bustle went 6-5 in 2005.

I can show you numbers, but virtually any service you use will show a significant decrease in strength of schedule form the Bustle years to the Hud years.

This along with the change in the NOLA Bowl invite requirements account for ALL of the difference in records between the 2 coaches once Bustle had the schollys back up to near normal in 2005.

Bustle rebuilt a program from nothing. Hudpseth inherited everything and was given an easier schedule to boot.

We don't know what Bustle would have done with a 12th game in 2005 so he has to vacate the winning season.

He was 6-5 in 2006 and lost his last game, then fired all his coaches, so he must agree with me.

[cajunhawk]

We don't know what Bustle would have done with a 12th game in 2005 so he has to vacate the winning season.

He was 6-5 in 2006 and lost his last game, then fired all his coaches, so he must agree with me.

Didn't we just fire the entire defensive staff after a 9-4 season?