Originally Posted by cajunhawk The oldest one is named Snowball... I have no idea what you are talking about nor the point you are trying to make.
Originally Posted by lcitsh I have no idea what you are talking about nor the point you are trying to make. Snowball enjoys balls of yarn...and when you rub his belly.
Originally Posted by Clutch0364 It helps us win all those paper titles... ----It helps if the paper titles winners would be around to play---huge attrition in these last years for all sorts of reasons!!! And of course this creates the G-5 problem of DEPTH!!!
plain and simply. THE WHOLE TEAM IS CONFUSED> Game plan sucks. = they suck
Originally Posted by cajunfan79 I'm getting sick and tired of this zone read crap Good thing they run it if the QB was not a run threat Eli would get hit in the backfield every play.
Originally Posted by Bicky Rustle Good thing they run it if the QB was not a run threat Eli would get hit in the backfield every play. Or the QB could back people out of the box and McGuire could have some space.
Originally Posted by cajun4life Or the QB could back people out of the box and McGuire could have some space. Unfortunately that QB hasn't been recruited here at this point.
Originally Posted by Bicky Rustle Unfortunately that QB hasn't been recruited here at this point. Haack is that QB. He never was given a chance.
Originally Posted by cajun4life Or the QB could back people out of the box and McGuire could have some space. A couple of well placed quick slants over the middle would soften that up.
Originally Posted by cajun4life Haack is that QB. He never was given a chance. Amen.
Originally Posted by cajun4life Haack is that QB. He never was given a chance. Why couldn't he do it vs Akron? Every other team has thrown well against them.
Originally Posted by CrappDaddy Why couldn't he do it vs Akron? Every other team has thrown well against them. He had a total of 17 passes and still had a higher QBR than Nixon. Haack also rushed for more yards against Akron than Nixon did. Haack was set up to fail.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Forum Rules