Final: Louisiana (27) vs A-State (37)

[DieHard1280]

Ok, I hope I'm not breaking RP's no politics policy, this is just an analogy.

Nixon is the better player politician, and receivers have shown that they are willing to drop balls in order to get their politician under center.

Here is the result:
1) A natural QB operating at 0% on the bench.

2) A RB/FB build type operating at 70% as a QB.

3) A Nationally recognized RB operating at 25% and functioning more as a receiver.

4) Receivers who got what they wanted except their choice can't get them the ball except in rare occasions.

The problem is multiple players playing out of position (or benched) lowering overall production exponential.

ps I know this wasn't PC

That's ok Turbine. I'm using my cell phone right now too.

[Fais do-do]

I see receivers really trying with bad passes and also, I see few receivers dragging $ss with good throws. Go figure?

[ATXCajun]

I have no doubt that the way this coaching staff recruited Haack just to let him rot on the bench because they are incapable of making adjustments to their scheme to utilize their talent (also known as coaching) will prevent any good passing QBs that have other offers from signing with the Cajuns.

I don't know that we did recruit him. There is a chance he came to us on his own to join his sister.

[MelRock]

I don't know that we did recruit him. There is a chance he came to us on his own to join his sister.

Hud recruited him hard. After the AZ game Hud met with him on his layover in Houston.

[cajunhawk]

Hud recruited him hard. After the AZ game Hud met with him on his layover in Houston.

And he was so impressed with him...he decided to ruin his college career over personal preference.

[Turbine]

Haack's untapped abilities are more on Jay Johnson than Hud.

Some coaches steer players to a particular ACT testing location and some coaches steer players to the bench.

[CrappDaddy]

And he was so impressed with him...he decided to ruin his college career over personal preference.

It was Haacks job to lose and he lost it. Quit making excuses for the guy. Maybe he'll earn it back, maybe he won't. You aren't the coach and I highly doubt your a good judge of talent. So let it be.....

[CrappDaddy]

I sure hope Jordan Wright is all they think he is next year, we need RB's... Will be losing 3 seniors

Doubting that he is at this point. We would have seen him play by now.

[Turbine]

It was Haacks job to lose and he lost it. Quit making excuses for the guy. .....

All his starts were billed as tentative (and it could be claimed) with an offense designed to make him fail, so "his to lose" doesn't carry the traditional meaning.

[CrappDaddy]

All his starts were billed as tentative (and it could be claimed) with an offense designed to make him fail, so "his to lose" doesn't carry the traditional meaning.

This isn't little league. Not everyone gets a chance to play and a participation trophy. I'm not sure why some are so hell bent on making excuses for poor mr Haack. If the guy was the next Jake Delhomme, you can bet your ___ he'd be starting.

[cajun4life]

This isn't little league. Not everyone gets a chance to play and a participation trophy. I'm not sure why some are so hell bent on making excuses for poor mr Haack. If the guy was the next Jake Delhomme, you can bet your ___ he'd be starting.

Trust me buddy, Nixon was Hud's guy from the beginning. Haack out played him in every practice and every scrimmage so he had to go with Haack. When Haack struggled against Akron that's all Hud needed to go with HIS guy.

It is that cut and dry. Haack was never given a leash as long as Nixons.

[CrappDaddy]

Trust me buddy, Nixon was Hud's guy from the beginning. Haack out played him in every practice and every scrimmage so he had to go with Haack. When Haack struggled against Akron that's all Hud needed to go with HIS guy.

It is that cut and dry. Haack was never given a leash as long as Nixons.

Are you an assistant or have inside info? Just curious?