Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 17 ... LastLast
Results 73 to 84 of 251

Thread: Intentional Grounding, The 2011 Rogue Coach NCAA Infractions

  1. #73

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    Well I guess this will give us a couple of years to get hungry for a bowl game. The way the outside of the APC looks, the flag raising, the PA system at cajun field along with other things we all complain about are minor in comparison.


  2. #74

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    Quote Originally Posted by Oiler View Post
    I've heard nothing about UL vacating anything yet. Was this supposedly done today?
    It's part of the university response to the NCAA on August 20th, 2015. It's one of the two PDFs on the link with the article from the university released tonight.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #75

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    I just hope the effects are contained to football...on the face they should be, but if the sanctions are harsh, it could trickle down


  4. #76
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    I simply don't understand these things. Why do I or you have to suffer for the behavior of this rogue coach? It's always this way with the NCAA. Why aren't the people that did this not prosecuted instead? Even if this happens with a school we have a major disdain for, I do not agree with penalizing the entire university. That doesn't prevent a criminally inspired person from attempting to further his own career. What's to say someone infiltrates a school, under payment from another rival, just to get them in trouble? Screw paying a player. Pay a mole in a rival organization to cheat. My point isn't that this happened here. It's just that the NCAA has notoriously used the expectation of perfect compliance policing internal to a program (impossible) and they don't seem to focus on the individual offender. If you prosecute the direct offender, it would be more effective.


  5. UL Football Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    You cannot as the NCAA do anything to the individual coach except make him a poison pill for other programs. The NCAA is telling it's members it's up to them to be overwrought with fear and trepidation. It's their responsibility.


  6. #78

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    We should sue the NCAA for not finding this out while Saunders was at Ole Miss.


  7. #79

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    Before anyone else ask another question please spend twenty or thirty minutes reading the documents that are linked in this thread. They will answer all your questions with the exception of the redacted names of the student athletes. Won't be hard to figure out who they are.

    Seems our athletic staff has been consumed with a lot more than the APC.


  8. #80
    Oiler's Avatar Oiler is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    I simply don't understand these things. Why do I or you have to suffer for the behavior of this rogue coach? It's always this way with the NCAA. Why aren't the people that did this not prosecuted instead? Even if this happens with a school we have a major disdain for, I do not agree with penalizing the entire university. That doesn't prevent a criminally inspired person from attempting to further his own career. What's to say someone infiltrates a school, under payment from another rival, just to get them in trouble? Screw paying a player. Pay a mole in a rival organization to cheat. My point isn't that this happened here. It's just that the NCAA has notoriously used the expectation of perfect compliance policing internal to a program (impossible) and they don't seem to focus on the individual offender. If you prosecute the direct offender, it would be more effective.
    I agree. Is an employer held accountable if one of his employees robs a bank?

  9. #81

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    So we went 0-12 in 2011?


  10. #82

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginScotsman View Post
    So we went 0-12 in 2011?
    Yes. I've never heard of the NCAA not accepting self imposed penalties. On the other hand they don't have a problem adding to them.

  11. #83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun90 View Post
    Before anyone else ask another question please spend twenty or thirty minutes reading the documents that are linked in this thread. They will answer all your questions with the exception of the redacted names of the student athletes. Won't be hard to figure out who they are.

    Seems our athletic staff has been consumed with a lot more than the APC.
    I said this in a post earlier in the week. There is something else on the coaching staff's mind and losing a few games or even a whole bad season is small potatoes compared to what is actually going on. This sucks big time.

  12. #84

    Default Re: UL Lafayette issues statement on NCAA allegations

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginScotsman View Post
    So we went 0-12 in 2011?
    I believe it would be 0-4 in 2011 if all the wins are vacated. The football program would essentially be giving up the wins. The opposing teams would not be credited with wins against your program in the case of vacancies, though.

    Now, if your program forfeited the entire season, then you would be 0-13 in the record books in 2011.

Page 7 of 21 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 17 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 10th, 2013, 09:30 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •