Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 43

Thread: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know

  1. #25

    Default Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know

    Screw it. Start Davis


  2. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    14 carries for 83 yards for a 5.9 ypc.
    10 carries for 29 yards for a 2.9 ypc.

    I'll let you take s guess at whose stats are for wich QB.
    Last week not withstanding, because no one played well, you can't say the team didn't react better to Nixon in game 1. Now, that may be bc of the back up mentality we all know about and would not see it if he started, but there is no doubt he added a spark haack didn't have.

  3. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ManAboutTown View Post
    Keep your facts out of this...

    Per Hud, Brooks was the most affected by last Saturday's loss. I say we give him the reigns and let him go ape-shhyt.
    I think he's really talented, don't get me wrong, but I don't think he has it in him to go apeshyt. Would love to be wrong, I just don't see the passion or urgency I want to see in the leader of the team.

  4. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    14 carries for 83 yards for a 5.9 ypc.
    10 carries for 29 yards for a 2.9 ypc.

    I'll let you take s guess at whose stats are for wich QB.
    I don't need to guess. If you pay attention, most of those came against NWST. Let's see who leads this stat at the end of the season why don't we.

  5. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LOUISIANA RAGIN View Post
    Saw Landor on TV last night with SLU- Could he have been the answer?
    Short answer. No.

  6. #30
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know

    Why are you guys so damn concerned about which QB should start. Are all of you blind? The effectiveness of our offense has had zero to do, so far, with QB play. There isn't a discernible difference from our vantage point to make any assessment of QBs. Our play calling is the major suspect. Our OL has completely dictated our run and passing lack of success, against anything decent in front of them, and due to bad play calling with our skill people - running a guy meant for space up the gut - Tom Brady and Russell Wilson would look like Abott and Costello. And unless Jamal mans up today... I'd rather he sit the bench.

    Again... quit being your girlfriends daughter discussing football. We haven't set any QB up to be anything other than a failure. And anything our coaches do to play "QB mystery week" is a distraction itself. Who cares who starts? Starts? Really? Starts? I care who succeeds. And if you're so ____ sure you can choose that QB right now... you're as confused as our OC... and that's not a good thing.


  7. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappDaddy View Post
    I don't need to guess. If you pay attention, most of those came against NWST. Let's see who leads this stat at the end of the season why don't we.
    8 carries 32 yards.
    10 carries 29 yards.

    That's taking out the NSU game.

  8. #32
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappDaddy View Post
    I don't need to guess. If you pay attention, most of those came against NWST. Let's see who leads this stat at the end of the season why don't we.
    Do you understand the point? How is it that Nixon can overcome the issues around him and run us into a win today? How can you tell that he's equipped, today, to make our offense operate better? I can't say it's Haack or Nixon. The only smart thing about choosing one over the other would be what Hud and Jay "cleverly" conjured up as the most effective set and sequence of plays. Nixon may be better in some / Haack in others. But to think it's a given at this point... no way. Our men over 30 have to succeed today before our men under 30 do.

  9. #33

    Default Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know

    Ok, I will finally admit it. I was wrong about Haack. With all the numerous threads about who to start, who is better, etc, etc, we all missed the obvious choice to who the starting QB will be. There is 1 QB in our system that Jay Johnson will bring out his A game for and he should be our starter now. Bring on Gunner!


  10. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RaginCajun08 View Post
    Ok, I will finally admit it. I was wrong about Haack. With all the numerous threads about who to start, who is better, etc, etc, we all missed the obvious choice to who the starting QB will be. There is 1 QB in our system that Jay Johnson will bring out his A game for and he should be our starter now. Bring on Gunner!
    Saw a picture of him and hud throwing. I have sneaky suspicion he will come out the starter tonight

  11. #35

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cajun4life View Post
    8 carries 32 yards.
    10 carries 29 yards.

    That's taking out the NSU game.
    Again, let's revisit that stat in December.

  12. #36

    Default Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know

    I don think many on here are giving credit to what was a very good defense for Akron. They had more to do with our lack of offense than Haack, Nixon, or Jay Johnson.


Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 9 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 83
    Last Post: July 30th, 2017, 07:30 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 20th, 2015, 11:30 pm
  3. RAGIN' CAJUNS QUARTERBACK CLUB
    By Turbine in forum Football
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 26th, 2002, 11:05 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •