While I can't disagree that a team often reflects the mindset of the head coach, I'm not sure how you've been able to discern that Hud over-values emotion in terms of preparation. If you'd care to provide some examples, I'd appreciate it.
I'm not a student of the game, nor have I ever played it so there are many aspects of it that are beyond my basic understanding. For instance, I recall discussing our recent history with Texas State football with fans on another forum. Like your team's recent history with us, we own Texas State. I wondered how it is that we could be so dominant over them, yet turn around and lose to a team that they then seem to dominate. Another Cajun poster pointed out that the answer is often as simple as "matchups".
There's no doubt that no matter how good an individual coach may be, if the other team has bigger, faster, better athletes they're likely to win the game. As G. Gordon Liddy always said, a good big guy will beat a good little guy virtually every trip of the train. It's in those head-to-head conference-type matchups where I think the quality of the coaching staff makes the difference, especially their ability to make adjustments at half time. Sometimes I grade Hud well, sometimes not-so-well. His history of getting the team up for bowl games has been stellar, but each year we lose a game or two that most of us fans believe we should have won. Last week's was one of them and Hud later identified some of the things that had me considering Akron as a trap game. Damn if it wasn't.
Having said all of that, I still wouldn't trade him for Holtz. Hud was the right guy at the right time for our program and I doubt anyone could have accomplished what he has, especially off the field. Yeah, this year and last we've had our share of embarrassing loses, but so has LaTech.
Here's to a good, hard-fought, injury-free game Saturday night and thanks for taking the time to answer my questions.