We didn't play Nixon and assorted other starters due to injury......injuries that will be much better healed by taking this game off and having an open date next week. And like the guys said on the radio, 44 points on only 50 plus plays from offense ain't exactly chopped liver.
Yeah, we've got a lot of work to do on defense, but we knew that going into the game. Hud said it was going to take a number of games before our defensive players understood the entire playbook.
We won't win them all from here on out, but I bet we're competitive in every single game.
The UL Facebook page said there 6,000 students at the game. I know when I was a student, my ID was NEVER scanned. Not even once that I can think of.
Just concern, looks a lot like last year, one take a way after 2 games. However, offense is looking stout.
I thought we played fairly generic on both sides of the ball. Not surprising given the competition. Lots of names being tossed out in the fourth quarter I wasn't familiar with. I felt like we did exactly what was expected.
We destroyed these guys with basic plays and subbing in 3rd string guys in the 4th quarter. Not sure what more anyone could expect from week two.
I expect a defense playing a team of inferior talent to be able to tackle and not allow 4-5 yards per attempt. While there was exceptions, most of the guys that had first shot at a tackle missed, grabbed at shoulders and slipped off or got faked. We need to do a lot better at the basic fundamentals before LT@Ruston
Same here. Reported attendance is not a big deal in the grand scheme of things, but then again it is. On the other hand, it's frustrating when the folks at the gate don't give a "blank" and sell short your fan base. After years of coming in and out of games, they clearly don't care and they constantly prove that every year.
boy, I am pumped at HAACK ATTACK played!!! Not only his passing but his running too.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)