Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 133

Thread: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

  1. #37

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by crazycajun View Post
    It's an article quoting farmer, do you think he would have been quoted as " yeah I really screwed this pooch...again" you said in your earlier post that the article says " it wasn't farmers fault" the article doesn't say that... So why don't you prove he didn't. You are inferring from an article that only he is quoted in.
    I am not looking for proof in the article.

    VO touch a little of what I was looking for.

  2. Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by raoul View Post
    This
    ---Who is our attorney that can bring a case of some sort to null and void the contract? Like did Farmer, T-Joe, the UL board, the board of regents, the gov, the treasurer, or anybody else that needed to sign that didn't???

  3. #39

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunDreDog View Post
    Not trying to be argumentative, but didn't the SBC sign the deal with ESPN? Not UL. So when that was signed all SBC schools are included. Did Farmer have a choice to not be included in the SBC TV contract?
    And did Farmer have a choice, assuming that he did release the tier 3, not to release them. Sounds like the article says that if cox weren't in certain areas then the deal would still be on.


    "The contract between the Sun Belt and ESPN essentially states that individual conference-member schools can create their own station or network and air it in any state the SBC has a school in, or in any state that touches that state — but no states beyond that.

    According to Farmer, however, CST has reach into a small number of outlying areas that would be in conflict with the ESPN contract — for instance, some homes in the San Diego area of California."

    If Farmer release the rights to the SBC, why is he trying to establish a new network to broadcast the same game that he released?

  4. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bigbuf View Post
    I am not looking for proof in the article.

    VO touch a little of what I was looking for.
    The guy you called out for proof said the same exact thing asVO then you pointed out the article as proof farmer didn't screw the pooch.

  5. #41

    Ragin' Cajuns Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    The article is a puff piece for Farmer. Note that the only quote from anyone other than Farmer was from an SBC press release about the timing of its ESPN deal. Nothing from CST, nothing from ESPN, the actual parties to the deal. And no tough questions for Farmer about why we were able to televise on Cox under our old ESPN contract, but not the new one.

    Contrast this article with the one in the News Star linked by BOP in the "And you think we have issues" thread, where the reporter actually talked to people on both sides of the story.


  6. #42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VObserver View Post
    The article is a puff piece for Farmer. Note that the only quote from anyone other than Farmer was from an SBC press release about the timing of its ESPN deal. Nothing from CST, nothing from ESPN, the actual parties to the deal. And no tough questions for Farmer about why we were able to televise on Cox under our old ESPN contract, but not the new one.
    Thank you... It's a clown show as usual, its uh
    Actually starting to maybe kinda like a huh, maybe kind of like radio sorta thing... Maybe.. Dude is a moron

  7. #43

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    First...I don't call anyone out. I said that I didn't want to start anything just trying to learn something.

    policarp said Farmer screwed up and that article said something different. I simply asked for proof of how Farmer screwed up. For example, a person having first hand knowledge of Farmer name on a contract release the teir 3 rights of UL athletics to the SBC. I don't think that document is in existence due to the fact that Farmer is trying to put together a deal to broadcast UL athletics.

    And I said the VO touched a little of what I was looking for. Read the other posts.


  8. #44

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    I'm guessing that 3rd tier TV rights are basically the school being able to broadcast their own games.

    New Mexico St still has their network, so maybe the contract didn't get rid of the Ragin' Cajuns TV Network. If they can have theirs, we should be able to have ours.

    Assuming again, then maybe we don't have a deal because of something with Cox. Maybe it is the fact that CST is available in parts of California which violates the SBC TV contract with ESPN.

    I'm just asking questions here. Not at all trying to be argumentative. Want proof that Farmer screwed up. I see none so far. I'm assuming a lot here and I think everyone else maybe as well unless there is something else we just don't know.


  9. #45

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by VObserver View Post
    The article is a puff piece for Farmer. Note that the only quote from anyone other than Farmer was from an SBC press release about the timing of its ESPN deal. Nothing from CST, nothing from ESPN, the actual parties to the deal. And no tough questions for Farmer about why we were able to televise on Cox under our old ESPN contract, but not the new one.

    Contrast this article with the one in the News Star linked by BOP in the "And you think we have issues" thread, where the reporter actually talked to people on both sides of the story.
    By virtue of you having to ask questions about the contract its safe to assume that you don't know the specifics of the deals and are only guessing as to how Farmer screwed the pouch.

  10. #46

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Bigbuf and I are in the same boat here. Just want factual answers.


  11. #47

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunDreDog View Post
    I'm guessing that 3rd tier TV rights are basically the school being able to broadcast their own games.

    New Mexico St still has their network, so maybe the contract didn't get rid of the Ragin' Cajuns TV Network. If they can have theirs, we should be able to have ours.

    Assuming again, then maybe we don't have a deal because of something with Cox. Maybe it is the fact that CST is available in parts of California which violates the SBC TV contract with ESPN.

    I'm just asking questions here. Not at all trying to be argumentative. Want proof that Farmer screwed up. I see none so far. I'm assuming a lot here and I think everyone else maybe as well unless there is something else we just don't know.
    Sounds like NMSU's AD didn't sign away their 3rd tier rights and ours did because they are in our conference under the same TV contract and have their Aggie network. Our RCN went away... Wonder why?

  12. #48

    Default Re: UL exploring options for regional TV deal

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunDreDog View Post
    Bigbuf and I are in the same boat here. Just want factual answers.
    Yep.

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 1st, 2013, 03:50 pm
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 7th, 2013, 11:40 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 19th, 2011, 08:50 am
  4. LUS, Cox exploring wireless options
    By NewsCopy in forum News Acadiana
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 24th, 2010, 01:40 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •