Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Football attendance with surprises

  1. #21

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Quote Originally Posted by Boomer View Post

    -HEy C-EX maybe you can help me on this ---What were the factors that DEcreased our not having the crowds we expected??? I realize that the early losses were a problem, but was the weather ok??

    Box score shows 70s and either clear or partly cloudy for those games, Boomer. LTU was 80(ish) and partly cloudy also.

  2. #22

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunFan3406 View Post
    I'm a little skeptical of UTSA's numbers. I'd have to see some crowd shots. Unless the games they played against the Texas schools and Arizona last year offset what I could only guess were poorly attended games against New Mexico, FIU, and USM.

    EDIT: Also they were 4-8, even more skeptical.
    There's literally nothing else in town for people to go see, besides the Spurs. UTSA has always been a huge draw in San Antonio

  3. #23

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Southern rain all day and almost all game without a doubt. LaTech can't remember.


  4. #24
    Cajunjeb is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Cajun Field capacity is 36,900. Based on last year's average, we averaged 70% capacity.

    75% is an increase of 1900 fans which would put at 12th.
    80% is an increase of 3745 fans which would put at 8th.
    100% puts the attendance at 3rd.


  5. #25

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Quote Originally Posted by cajunfan337 View Post
    There's literally nothing else in town for people to go see, besides the Spurs. UTSA has always been a huge draw in San Antonio
    Googled some crowd shots. Some of them look like they have decent numbers in the stands.

    A bit off topic, I was wondering why UTEP, UTSA, and UTA all had orange as one of their school colors. Thought it was some coincidence, but then I realized the UT system connection.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajunjeb View Post
    Cajun Field capacity is 36,900. Based on last year's average, we averaged 70% capacity.

    75% is an increase of 1900 fans which would put at 12th.
    80% is an increase of 3745 fans which would put at 8th.
    100% puts the attendance at 3rd.
    Thanks, interesting breakdown.

  7. #27

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunFan3406 View Post
    Googled some crowd shots. Some of them look like they have decent numbers in the stands.

    A bit off topic, I was wondering why UTEP, UTSA, and UTA all had orange as one of their school colors. Thought it was some coincidence, but then I realized the UT system connection.
    Interesting..also UT-Tyler, UT - Brownsville, UT-Dallas, UT-Pan AM all have orange as a color. Looks like they all adobted the color from UT-Austin when they started their programs.

  8. #28

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunJack55 View Post
    Interesting..also UT-Tyler, UT - Brownsville, UT-Dallas, UT-Pan AM all have orange as a color. Looks like they all adobted the color from UT-Austin when they started their programs.
    Look at the two main schools in the California System. Both bears as mascots and blue and gold colors. I wonder if the other schools have gold or blue colors.

    Cal - Berkeley - Bears - Blue (dark) and Gold
    Cal - Los Angeles - Bruins - Blue (light) and Gold

  9. #29

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Here's my photos from the season.
    https://andreshootspics.shutterfly.com

    I just realized I still haven't posted bowl photos.....LOL


  10. #30

    Default Re: Football attendance with surprises

    Quote Originally Posted by moorecajun View Post
    What does really surprise me is Northern Ill.'s avg. attendance at 13.5k!
    NIU average attendance would be much lower if they did not control the Chicago market.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •