Hack under center...the offense will look more like the offense from Hud's first year with Blaine at QB. You don't have to be lighting fast to run this scheme. All the QB has to do is run enough to keep the defense honest.#freehaack
Hack under center...the offense will look more like the offense from Hud's first year with Blaine at QB. You don't have to be lighting fast to run this scheme. All the QB has to do is run enough to keep the defense honest.#freehaack
and lets not forget nixon threw a terrible pic at the spring game. just chunked it up and prayed.
Remember we were missing 6'4 and 6'7 receivers on each side for spring game.
I'm not sure whether this helps or hurts in the evaluation of each QB in the spring. It certainly hurts their passing productivity... but I'm not sure if not having these targets helped/hurt the best passer... or hurt/helped the worst passer. A big target can make an average QB look good... especially if the defense isn't as jacked up as they will be for a real opponent. But, multiple targets, of all sizes/speeds/positions on the field... is a benefit to a great passing QB.
We really need to see who is more effective with all of his weapons available. That may not happen until we play game one.
Haack at QB delivers two things that none of the other candidates can [at this time].
First: Because he can read his progressions so well, he can distribute the ball on each play to the playmaker with the best opportunity to make something positive happen.
Second: Because defenses cannot stack the box with Haack at QB, our running backs, especially those not named McGuire, will have a much easier time finding seams and creases to run in, and the one that IS named McGuire will rush for 1500 yards.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)