we went 3-9 after we went 6-5 with bustle....whats not pointing to that?
an added loss to go 6-6??
obviously not, but i want better than 3-9, i want 7-5 or 8-4. thats my point, we wont get there with bustle, if we go 6-6 it should be with a new guy so he atleast has a year under his belt to get his system in staff in place. it puts us one year ahead of the learning curve.
Bustles very best year is only three games better than Baldwin, he has been given three times as long to get it.
exactly why i said earlier hence 3 years to build a program. give the guy 3 years, if he has 3 bcs schools and cant win 7-8 games yes fire him. im nottrying to making friends with these guys or expect them come in and have a great stay in lafayette and not win, they need to come in and produce a winner...3 years to do it, if they cant move on. thats why we have been mediocre for so long, we dont put any pressure on our coaches to succeed
With our current budget, Nick Saban "MIGHT" be able to do that 1 out of every 4 or 5 years.
My point is that we MUST back off of the money games. Limit them to 1 per year, which means that our team would then have a fighting chance to win 11 of the games on its schedule. THEN, it would be realistic to demand 7 or 8 wins... and even 9 every few years.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)