Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 13 to 24 of 24

Thread: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

  1. #13

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by ShowDog View Post
    _ I agree 100%. Way too many bowls and we definitely don't deserve one. _
    Way too many bowls IMO. But, I do not an any way mean for my comments to diminish the accomplishments of the team this year or to be a slight on any of the players. I would love nothing better than to see them play in a bowl game.

  2. #14

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by ShowDog View Post
    _ I agree 100%. Way too many bowls and we definitely don't deserve one. _

    I could not possibly disagree more...

    With the amount of money spent per win, it's an absolute off the charts statistical anomally that we have recorded enough wins to even qualify. Same goes for ULM as well. You should be sitting there with your teeth in your mouth in utter stunned amazement that UL is bowl elidgible, this feat is like a guy wearing horn rimmed glasses and Converse high-tops winning a NASCAR race on a freakin skateboard with racing stripes and flames painted on top when compared to what some of the other qualified programs have spent in order to achieve the same results. To properly couch this for you, Coach Bustle would have to work 50+ years to earn the buyout value on Charlie Weiss's contract...

  3. #15

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by Go_UL View Post
    _ Do you think LSU will turn in that national championship with Two losses because they did not deserve it. I will take it any way we can get it. I'm not saying they did not deserve. Alot of wierd things had to happen for them. _
    Why exactly didn't LSU deserve the national championship? They were the best team in the country all year and then won the BCS national championship game. Get a grip. Just because you love watching the Cajuns win 3-6 games a year doesn't mean you need to throw LSU into the same category. Or are you one of those Cajuns fans who thinks you have to hate LSU to exist?

  4. #16

    Ragin' Cajuns Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by Rasta View Post
    _ Why exactly didn't LSU deserve the national championship? They were the best team in the country all year and then won the BCS national championship game. Get a grip. Just because you love watching the Cajuns win 3-6 games a year doesn't mean you need to throw LSU into the same category. Or are you one of those Cajuns fans who thinks you have to hate LSU to exist? _
    No, he's one of those fans of UL who sees no need to pay any attention to any trolls from Refineryville.

    lsu&a&mc@br won a national championship in a year in which they had two losses. By definition, they were not the best team in the country on two fall Saturdays. No one said they didn't 'deserve' to win it, just that them even being there required an inordinate number of dominos to all fall in exactly the right pattern. The dominos cooperated, and the tigers took care of business on the field in the NC game.

    By the same token, if the Cajuns should happen to get a bowl this year because the stars all align properly, then they 'deserve' the bowl, precisely for the same reason that lsu&a&mc@br 'deserved' to be in the NC game: They met the qualifications and they were invited.

  5. #17

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun90 View Post
    _ Until we get a true playoff system then I have no problem with going to a bowl at 6-6.

    Keep in mind that one of the biggest things you have going for you with a bowl apperance is an extra month of practice time. That is huge. Especially for your young guys coming up in the system. _
    You take whatever bowl you can get, because it's a win-win situation. You get the recognition of being in a bowl game, and the extra practice time.

  6. #18

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by VObserver View Post
    No, he's one of those fans of UL who sees no need to pay any attention to any trolls from Refineryville.

    lsu&a&mc@br won a national championship in a year in which they had two losses. By definition, they were not the best team in the country on two fall Saturdays. No one said they didn't 'deserve' to win it, just that them even being there required an inordinate number of dominos to all fall in exactly the right pattern. The dominos cooperated, and the tigers took care of business on the field in the NC game.

    By the same token, if the Cajuns should happen to get a bowl this year because the stars all align properly, then they 'deserve' the bowl, precisely for the same reason that lsu&a&mc@br 'deserved' to be in the NC game: They met the qualifications and they were invited.

    Thank you so much for explaining my thoughts. Reading Comprehension is
    not important in baton rouge but the do have a great football team.
    I hope all is well in abbeville. I used to be your next door neighbor.

    Tim

  7. #19

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by Go_UL View Post
    Thank you so much for explaining my thoughts. Reading Comprehension is
    not important in baton rouge but the do have a great football team.
    I hope all is well in abbeville. I used to be your next door neighbor.

    Tim _
    NVM, fixed.

  8. #20

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    I don't get this "they didn't earn it, they don't deserve" thing.

    Whose fault is it that there 30 something bowl games? Does a 5-7 SEC "deserve" to go to a bowl game more than the Cajuns.

    If its available, no shame in taking advantage of it.


  9. #21

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Notre Dame players reportedly voted "no" to playing in a bowl game. The administration has the final word.


    igeaux.mobi


  10. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parrott View Post
    Notre Dame players reportedly voted "no" to playing in a bowl game. The administration has the final word.


    igeaux.mobi
    Wouldn't you think those players would have a chip on their shoulder, with something to prove? Guess not. Guess not.

    igeaux.mobi

  11. #23

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Still no chance, right? Bummer. Just checking


    igeaux.mobi


  12. #24

    Default Re: Bowl Lockout Seems Likely

    Quote Originally Posted by VObserver View Post
    _ No, he's one of those fans of UL who sees no need to pay any attention to any trolls from Refineryville.

    lsu&a&mc@br won a national championship in a year in which they had two losses. By definition, they were not the best team in the country on two fall Saturdays. No one said they didn't 'deserve' to win it, just that them even being there required an inordinate number of dominos to all fall in exactly the right pattern. The dominos cooperated, and the tigers took care of business on the field in the NC game.

    By the same token, if the Cajuns should happen to get a bowl this year because the stars all align properly, then they 'deserve' the bowl, precisely for the same reason that lsu&a&mc@br 'deserved' to be in the NC game: They met the qualifications and they were invited. _
    Actually, he did say that they didn't deserve to win the national championship. Since you got personal I'm going to continue... It never ceases to amaze me why there is this faction of Cajun fans who think you have to choose between them and LSU. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. If they were rivals it might make some sense. But since that will never happen, it's ridiculous. I love the Cajuns. I love LSU. But if idiots like you insist that I make a choice I'll take the national championships.
    Go Cajuns.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. I Bowl (Shreveport) NOLA Bowl (New Orleans) Go Daddy Bowl (Mobile)
    By UL_Cajuns in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 140
    Last Post: November 30th, 2013, 12:59 am
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 12th, 2011, 06:50 am
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 2nd, 2011, 01:11 am
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 1st, 2011, 09:10 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •