I agree with Both Brad & Josh. The 2 hardest postion to find is a PG & C they are out there but you have to find the one that really fits the style of plays you run. I don't know if the two incoming freshman we sign (Andrews & Mitchell) are that type of players. These 2(PG/Center) type of players will open up more opportunity for Chris & Travis.Mostly all teams that make it to the tourney have the 1-2 punch.The past few years we lost out on PG's either we didnt make a strong pitch or they felt they could of get more playing time else where. So I think they are out there but is up to the staff to find a O.Green or a Southall maybe we are doing that but only time will tell.
First, its Greg OdeN. Second of all, I was referring to the type of player that Greg is which is a prototypical center to the old days. A true 7 footer who is a good shot blocker, rebounder and makes his living playing on the blocks. The true, good and skilled protypical centers of today go to the large BCS programs. It's that simple. The only ones that don't are the Southall's who are trouble from the beginning. Don't forget, Southall was at a BCS school before he ended up at UL. I'd rather a couple of guys of the Marcus Stokes or Lonnie Thomas mold that were 6'8" ish but great on the boards, scored in the low post and were team guys. They played a lot bigger than they were and we can score a lot of those guys although there is a lot of teams out there right now starting to go to that type of player.
So, by your account, if we have some good low post players on this team, why must we stop recruiting and signing the 2 and 3 guards?
So again, how does this statement conflict with the thread? According to some of the services, these are some good players. ESPN has MacDougald rated as 83. That's higher, if I'm not mistaken than Gradnigo was coming out. You had a problem with the position that we were signing and the problem is, we have to build smaller, quicker teams centered around guard play and a couple of 6'8" guys down low that play big and rebound. The low post guys we have are not good so yes, we do need to sign some more of them but there are plenty of teams in the country the have really good guard play and get by with adequate low post play and succeed. I have no problem with these signings as long as they are program building players.
I think everybody is missing the bigger picture and that is, not only do you have to get the talent to come, but you have to have a coach who can coach and knows what he is doing, and we don't have that.
Mike with all due respect I don't think you can look at 2 ppg and really determine a whole lot of anything. It all depends on the situation that the 2ppg came from. If he is a sophomore and averaging 2 ppg and he is on a bad team and is getting ten shots a game, then that would be one thing.
However, he is coming from an incredibly strong junior college conference. Probably the best conference in the country and he played last year behind two high major wings. One whom was his brother, who was good enough for Butch Pierre to recruit. I can't imagine that the coaching staff is signing a ton of guys to scholarships who can't play in the early period. I would imagine that his numbers will increase dramatically this season. If we signed him to a scholarship, I'm sure he is deserving.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)