First off I ddi not say "tons" but ok I will say a lot of people care about UL that when reading the post I quoted they are mis counting... I can count 8.. repeat EIGHT.. people that i know personally that did not go to the game because of the weather... M-I-L and F-I-L, two elderly uncles and their wives..one friend who sort of is bi-support (closet a&m fans) that swore it was due to expected rain and not the purple team (ok maybe i dont believe THEM)... look we dont have the absolute die hards that a&m has but to proclaim there are only 12,000 who give a $%# about UL as the poster proclaimed is just wrong......
Next as to things I dont know about... i was a senior individual (all im going to say to not let on who I am) in the running of TDA before Gannett purchased the paper... yes I DO know what i am talking about..
Look I do believe that the paper supports UL.. I do also believe that since Gannett took over there has been a conscious effort to promte a&m to gain readership... i do believe that while the #'s will support Josh that they do run more UL stories I believe there is a deference towards a&m that is not given to UL... for example... when we were investigated by the NCAA for giving out T-shirts to atheletes for summer efforts it was FRONT PAGE HEADLINES... when a&m was investigated for Berkman giving below market apts to players it was page 6 SPORTS SECTION news.... DEFERENCE to a&m....."INVESTIGATIVE: reporting on Ul...
Finally I have given up my subscription to TDA... I pick it up on Sundays and on other days when I believe there is something worthwhile.. Part of it is because of thea&m coverage... more so however is the changes TDA has made... probably prudent from a business perspective.. to reduce the actual news coverage to save on newsprint costs..... I just dont like the paper as it is now........