Statements like this really bother me.
Look at the upper echelon of college football. Do you really believe the top 10 college football teams are there only because they have so much talent? I believe the "Coaches" have far more influence on winning than do "Good Players". Without a good coaching staff you can have the best players in the country and not win. All you have to do is look 50 (Mile's) to the east to see a team with all the "Good Players" a coach would ever want as a prime example of that. In fact, they lost the last 4 out of 6 bowl games. Do you really believe their losses were solely due to not having enough "Good Players"????
It's been my experience that "Good Coaches" create "Good Players" in all sports. Not the other way around. Talented athletic players are a nice luxury for "Good Coaches". A truly "Good Coach" can take the talent he has and create "Good Players".
Do really you think Hud turned our program around solely because he received an immediate influx of talented players? Bustle never won more than 6 games and never had a winning season as a head coach. Do you think that was because he just lacked "Good Players"?
Simply put, Hud is one of those coaches that can take an ordinary player and turn him into a better player. I just hope we can give Hud the resources to find and keep "Good Coaches". With "Good Coaches" you'll have "Good Players".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)