Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41

Thread: 86-3 is $1,400,000

  1. #21

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Quote Originally Posted by Parrott View Post
    _ Some of you might forget that many of these "guaranteed" games are scheduled years in advance. Illinois was horrible when added to the schedule but came off a Rose Bowl appearance when the Cajuns came to town.

    Last fall, the school turned down playing Arkansas in 2009 for $1.1 million in Little Rock because it wanted a more winnable game. Then a home-and-home with Kansas State opens up. The Cajuns win that game, a huge victory regardless of how bad the Wildcats might be considering they're from the Big 12, yet I've heard few people give credit to the school for scheduling that game.

    igeaux.mobi _
    I give major props to the adm. for scheduling that game... we need more of those!

    Scheduling is very difficult due to the fact that you need two to tango...

  2. #22

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    I see it as a necessary evil. We get to see how we stack up against the big boys and a big pay check. It's not like we are the only school doing it. All of the non BCS schools schedule BCS schools. I would not be very excited if our non conference schedule consisted of teams like Akron, Eastern Michigan, Buffalo, New Mexico, etc. And I think if you ask the players how they like going into Nebraska and playing on that huge stage? I think they like it. I"m not saying they like the result but if I had the ability and opportunity to play in a game in Lincoln I would. Plus what Parrot said. These games are scheduled years in advance. We got K St. on a down year. We got Nebraska on their way up. It is what it is. I would like it even if we did not get paid as much. I like to see how we progress from year to year. Look at the K st. game. 2 years ago we would have lost that game. Progress. In 2006 we got blown out and did not compete against LSU. This year is a different story. Progress. I see it as a good gauge.


  3. #23

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    The bottom line is a program like UL needs two money games a season. Fill the other spots with other mid-major leagues (MAC, C-USA, etc.) and a I-AA every few years. You have to play the big boys for the money, plus as a selling point in recruiting. Yes, that matters to some recruits.


    igeaux.mobi


  4. #24

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Quote Originally Posted by cjr3888 View Post
    _ No need to worry everyone. When I win the Powerball jackpot Wednesday, I will allocate money to bring regional BCS schools to Cajun Field every year for at least the next 10 years.


    igeaux.mobi _
    I'll allocate my winnings for upgrades to the stadium!

  5. Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kernel View Post
    _ This is absurd. The two things are not mutually exclusive. I understand the necessity of scheduling "guarantee" games. But I also expect something slightly above complete embarrassment in those games. I didn't expect to win them, but last Saturday was a joke.

    And the fact that so many around here are satisfied with that outcome because we got paid and satisfied that we made LSU "earn" their win is why this football program has been one of the worst in the nation for too many years. We were just humiliated and the consensus is, "oh well." _
    Were you there --and did you know of our injury problems???

  6. Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Quote Originally Posted by Parrott View Post
    _ The bottom line is a program like UL needs two money games a season. Fill the other spots with other mid-major leagues (MAC, C-USA, etc.) and a I-AA every few years. You have to play the big boys for the money, plus as a selling point in recruiting. Yes, that matters to some recruits.


    igeaux.mobi _
    Nice to finally meet you in lincoln---You are on the money!!!!!

  7. #27

    Ragin' Cajuns Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Originally Posted by anhil8tor
    Are any of you unhappy at our last two loses willing to put up the 1.4 million?

    No, I'd rather the state do it, instead of lining the pockets of that school across the basin.


  8. #28

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Is $1.4 million worth getting our heads bashed in?

    We certainly don't need that chump change to field softball, baseball, golf, volleyball, track, soccer or tennis teams...or outfit the weight room. Those programs are all self-supporting, so what's the big deal? Besides, what's so terribly wrong with those teams missing 8-10 days of class so they can hitch-hike to competitions?

    How dare we schedule those "money" games!


  9. #29

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Quote Originally Posted by GetTheFacts1st View Post
    _ Is $1.4 million worth getting our heads bashed in?

    We certainly don't need that chump change to field softball, baseball, golf, volleyball, track, soccer or tennis teams...or outfit the weight room. Those programs are all self-supporting, so what's the big deal? Besides, what's so terribly wrong with those teams missing 8-10 days of class so they can hitch-hike to competitions?

    How dare we schedule those "money" games! _
    Check your info. Those programs are NOT self-supporting.

  10. #30
    CajunZ1's Avatar CajunZ1 is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Fan for Sure

    Default Re: 86-3 is $1,400,000

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunRed View Post
    _ Check your info. Those programs are NOT self-supporting. _
    Sar-casm

    Took me two reads to catch it myself.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •