I see it as a necessary evil. We get to see how we stack up against the big boys and a big pay check. It's not like we are the only school doing it. All of the non BCS schools schedule BCS schools. I would not be very excited if our non conference schedule consisted of teams like Akron, Eastern Michigan, Buffalo, New Mexico, etc. And I think if you ask the players how they like going into Nebraska and playing on that huge stage? I think they like it. I"m not saying they like the result but if I had the ability and opportunity to play in a game in Lincoln I would. Plus what Parrot said. These games are scheduled years in advance. We got K St. on a down year. We got Nebraska on their way up. It is what it is. I would like it even if we did not get paid as much. I like to see how we progress from year to year. Look at the K st. game. 2 years ago we would have lost that game. Progress. In 2006 we got blown out and did not compete against LSU. This year is a different story. Progress. I see it as a good gauge.
The bottom line is a program like UL needs two money games a season. Fill the other spots with other mid-major leagues (MAC, C-USA, etc.) and a I-AA every few years. You have to play the big boys for the money, plus as a selling point in recruiting. Yes, that matters to some recruits.
igeaux.mobi
Originally Posted by anhil8tor
Are any of you unhappy at our last two loses willing to put up the 1.4 million?
No, I'd rather the state do it, instead of lining the pockets of that school across the basin.
Is $1.4 million worth getting our heads bashed in?
We certainly don't need that chump change to field softball, baseball, golf, volleyball, track, soccer or tennis teams...or outfit the weight room. Those programs are all self-supporting, so what's the big deal? Besides, what's so terribly wrong with those teams missing 8-10 days of class so they can hitch-hike to competitions?
How dare we schedule those "money" games!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)