Yeah, DC position at even a small school would pay more than outside LB coach at UL - he probably intended to go that route.
With Willis staying, he had no chance of getting the UL DC job.
i didnt buy it at first either but have heard from a few people close to the situation that it was for personal reasons. I just think if Matt W is willing to be a position coach, he can do that somewhere else for a lot more money or get a DC spot at a school in the G5 for more money than a positon coach here.
Even if you try to put the most generous spin on it and instead of saying he is "screwing" the coaches you try to say the new conference bowl revenue sharing plan took funds away that were there in previous years it is still a failure to deliver. And it would seem prudent to go to RCAF to try to obtain the funds. Scuttlebutt is that those efforts to find the money elsewhere were not made.
Stop. No way do I support reneging promises. But when HUD leaves whenever that may be, there will be 1 million reasons for someone else to want his job. And if no coaches out there want it, I'll be first in line to submit my resume. Hopefully all of you guys will be willing to be my references.
Now this I don't agree on. If the coaches were truly "promised" something that the athletic department reneged on, I agree with all of you that the Athletic Department (namely Farmer) is screwing up big time. But if it just so happens that the coaches assumed because in past years they got something that it would be the same this year, then all of a sudden the budget changed and it was because of the revenue sharing that something had to be cut, I don't find any fault there at all for the admin. I don't know about you guys, but in my line of work, when budgets get cut, you have to do the best you can with your allowance.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)