Read it, hated it. From someone who is highly educated, I would have expected a lot less generalization and a lot more objectivity, especially when using words such as "loser" and "not so-good people". I actually agree with the very broad assumption that when you start winning, you all of a sudden tend to gain all these fans that you never knew existed. They start telling you how "die hard" they are for a program they may or may not have any affiliation with which tends to be the case with a lot of LSU fans over the years. I also believe there tends to be a core group of fans for every team that support their program and school no matter how frustrated they are with outcomes of game or the current state of the administration. There are those on the fringes that support when things go well and back off in adversity, thus showing their character. However, I can not and will not call those people who don't thrust their support, financial or emotional, at a team that doesn't win as "losers" because true die-hard fans are a certain breed. Bandwagon fans can be good fans as their emotional connection to a university increases as they become more entrenched with the added successes.
I would also refrain from calling those people "not so-good people" as well. In many cases, the overall character of an individual has nothing to do with their fleeting support in bad times for a school or athletic program. These people may have no allegiance to that school or team but they may have strict morals and codes of conduct they conduct their daily lives or businesses by. There are a lot of businesses in this area that will support the cajuns when the accomplish a level of success and these businesses are run by really good people in most cases. Bandwagon fans frustrate me as they do many people but they are also crucial in helping us get to where we want to be in the future and I suggest you take that approach as well. If not, I at least hope you show more acceptance to the fact that some may not be as loyal as others.