It was a tough Sun Belt Conference opener for the Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns women's basketball team as the Cajuns shot a season-low 25 percent from the floor in a 67-41 defeat Tuesday to UALR at the Jack Stephens Center.
It was a tough Sun Belt Conference opener for the Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns women's basketball team as the Cajuns shot a season-low 25 percent from the floor in a 67-41 defeat Tuesday to UALR at the Jack Stephens Center.
So Sally's 0-1 as a collegiate head coach? She'll have to put in some extra work.
This loss should not have been unexpected. UALR is one of the best teams in the conference, and we were playing in their house. I was a bit surprised at losing that badly, but not by the loss.
Beau, if we finish at .500 in the SBC as currently configured, we need to seriously consider whether Brodhead is WBB's Hud or WBB's Bustle. I am inclined to believe the latter. There are only two teams with RPI's in the top 100, and one other [besides UL] between 101 and 200, and both of those are much closer to 200 than 100.
If Brodhead has made as much progress as others have claimed, we should be no worse than 14-6 in conference, and that includes being swept by the Arkansas teams and 2 road losses, one of which has to be to a bad team.
I do not think the women's team is there yet, I have not bought into the hype. The pre-conference schedule was very weak, but I like that they won all of those games. Now that being said we are moving in the right direction and the bigs he is bringing in next year will be a huge help and should get us another 6 wins or so and will compete for the conference tittle.
I hope you are right, Mel; but I have not seen it yet. We are nowhere near as big and athletic as we need to be. Perhaps the bigs coming will help, but of the bigs in this year's class, only Fields has contributed, and she is a rather small big at 5-11.
I hope I am right as well, I just no you are not going to win a whole lot of games with girls that are 5'3" unless you are shooting near 70%. We have a couple of girls coming in that are 6'2" and 6'3" if I remember correctly, we will need them to contribute immediately next year to start the transition. Our fast shooting guards will be seniors so we will finally have a good balance of youth and leadership on the team, that is one thing Gary has not had. We have been a young team, I will wait to hold judgment on everything until the end of the season.
While I agree with what you said here, I am concerned that the 2 girls over 6' that came in this year are totally invisible on the court. They have both played, so are not red-shirting, but neither has done much. My worry is that the bigs in next year's class will be similar.
Correction: one of the invisible bigs is 5'11".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)