Welcome to the club. I took a similar approach (not exactly the same method) and have received the same consideration. The difference is, I started over three years ago and haven't left it at one contact.
Another thing to remember, realignment is totally under the province of the president. The athletic director will be involved, but contacts, conversations and decisions are solely in the hands of the president. It's tougher to get information from him, for various reasons, but he's the one with all the answers.
I still argue that bowl games should regulated to one tie-in and then at large the other team. Screw money aspect associates with the conferences...the NCAA needs to step in. All this crap about the Rose needing to maintain Pac 12 versus Big 10 tradition....garbage.
I understand the president holds the keys. Maybe we take a little from the sales textbook. Considering realignment has a lot to do with sports, maybe having a civil conversation with the athletic director and showing that it is legitimate critiques could get a foot in the door to speak with the president.
So when prop,e criticize the admin on this board they are admonished for hiding behind screen games. Then when they are perfectly willing to stand behind their words by identifying themselves they are critisized. You guys need to make up your mind.
And yes I have identified myself because I have no problem standing behind my statements. It's your choice if you can't it won't do the same. And that knowledge of my identity and comments has never stopped the AD or anyone else in the admin from accepting my donations and cashing my checks.
You may characterize my actions as stupid while I might characterize yours as chicken____. It's all in the eye of the beholder, I guess.
No. That isn't what I'm saying.
My blog was in reference to football bowl games. I suggested the CUSA tie ins aren't great by any stretch of the imagination. I never suggested CUSA wasn't a good move. I never brought up other sports. This blog had everything to do with bowl games.
And, you proved my point with your comment about striving to be better.
If you are in the Sun Belt Conference, you're either playing in a Big 6 Bowl or New Orleans is your best bet. There is no in between.
Same is true for CUSA. You're either in a big six bowl or you're in the best CUSA bowl possible.
Same is true for the MAC. You're either in a big six bowl or you're in the best MAC bowl possible.
Same is true for the AAC. You're either in a big six bowl or you're in the best AAC bowl possible.
Same is true for the MWC. You're either in a big six bowl or Las Vegas is the best you're going to do.
We are (currently) in the Sun Belt. Unless we go 12-0 or in some years 11-1, there's no place better than New Orleans.
You would be AMAZED how, after four years, many fans still don't get it.
The thing I consider stupid is you think they will stop cashing the check that you voluntarily send because you are critical. Stop sending the check if things are so bad. As long as you keep sending the check and buying tickets, you are just the annoying mosquito that they have to keep swatting away. I don't want to see the athletic dept suffer, but things won't change until you start hurting them in the bank account. Seems like some of you need to make a decision.
Let me say this about CUSA.
Right now there is no opening. If there is, I'll write a blog and I'll be bringing up something NO ONE has suggested in any thread on this board, any newspaper article or any radio show.
If there is an opening in CUSA, there's only one way to get it.
We'll probably find out in mid-January what CUSA's plans are. We probably won't find out who they include.
The main reason you are not hearing anything out of C-USA territory is because they are waiting on the Big 12, and the Big 12's discussions about who they want and when are on hold for the holidays. Trust that January will bring a flurry of rumors, innuendos and suppositions about who is going where and when.
(quote Cajun T)
In most cases this is correct, but it wasn't until Oklahoma State upset Oklahoma and UL lost to App. State that the Armed Forces Bowl was completely out of the question for UL. And this will be the case most seasons. But there is no guarantee that the New Orleans Bowl will be available to UL in certain years unless they are the SBC champion. So there are no assurances that will be the case every season either. At that point, is the Go Daddy or Camellia Bowl more attractive then the Bowls in Houston or Dallas?
What does Okla. State winning have to do with the Armed Forces Bowl? The Armed Forces bowl is contracted to the AAC (Houston) and Army who did not qualify.
If Okla St. loses, the Cactus becomes open. And we would have had a different school in New Orleans as a result.
The bid went to Pitt out of the ACC. You think we were going to get chosen before them if we had beaten App???
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)