Are you really that simple? We blast Tech's arrogance. We were impressed with the fact that they gathered their most powerful alumni and campaigned to get into CUSA. We were impressed that they publicly stated they were going to raise their budget to a threshold CUSA liked, and were going to improve their facilities in x number of years. Where we accused them of lying, is that they never made good on their promise, but have suffered no repercussions. We yell about them "lying"... but in reality, they "sold" themselves, perhaps with every intent to meet their pledge. We, on the other hand, sent them a brochure and then said, "we're not ready".
In reality, there's a big difference between dead silence and a big public campaign. I want our admin to keep quiet about measures that will upset the chance of succeeding. But do yo really believe that they can't tell us anything? Nothing at all? Ever? They NEVER EVER say anything. They want us to be "Ragin" when it comes to attending and paying for ____. Would it hurt if Scott or T-Joe at least told us they are contacting CUSA regularly, learning the current and future member tenants, making sure we're aligning our objectives, getting to know their presidents, ADs and key boosters?
You act as if there's no reason we should suspect the activity out of Martin Hall on these matters. And get this straight... every damn person wanting to know something shouldn't be calling and writing to find out. That's absolutely stupid. They've got the time to entertain the same questions from a bunch of different people, but can't hold a meeting to explain the things they can explain without giving away the "UL secrets"? BS
Now, quit acting like it's black or white. They don't even get their foot into the first bit of gray. Guys like you continuously support their lack of public explanations, and you're part of the problem. Are we or are we not working toward CUSA membership? How's the work going? And if they're puzzled about what "work" is, they're too stupid to have their jobs.