Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: 2015 Cajuns' defensive concerns are front-loaded

  1. #21

    Default Re: 2015 Cajuns' defensive concerns are front-loaded

    Quote Originally Posted by CrappDaddy View Post
    Call me crazy, but I think the secondary is going to be much improved. Tracy Walker looks like a good one and we'll add Brazil and Thomas to the fold. There's good reason to believe that we will be much improved there and at linebacker.
    In certain areas, the secondary will be improved just as you mention which is the Safety spot. However, the CB depth and experience concern me and I fear we are going to philosophically run what we have run the last 4 years that drives all of us crazy but have less depth at the position.

  2. #22
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: 2015 Cajuns' defensive concerns are front-loaded

    Quote Originally Posted by ManAboutTown View Post
    If we can run a true man and get adequate pressure from the front 4 (Washington coming off the edge at times, J Bris and Taboris up the middle) we can navigate next year's schedule defensively. I believe we have the athletes to do it. Maybe Hud will trust the scheme now that its paid dividends for the team. Question for me is, who provides the speed and discipline at OLB?
    I think the evidence is more than enough to convince him of the correct core scheme to teach and focus our defense around. I'm afraid of one thing... and Zephyr points to it... and that is if he's willing to stick to it with some new secondary members and new key DL. He needs to regardless. But will he? It does concern me. He could argue to himself that it was only after our defense got the experience to play man that it worked. He needs to count on the new unit and just work them through their errors, but stick to man cover and max pressure. It's the correct path. Success isn't an event. It's a process. And Hud needs to just follow the prescription and stop thinking "but I don't want to give up the big play". You did. Over and over and over. Don't ever go back to soft cover. You'll only feed the opposition exactly what they want you to feed them. They all laughed at our prevent defense and ate us a new hole. Thank the Lord we had enough offense... and most of our schedule opposition weren't good football teams.

  3. #23

    Default Re: 2015 Cajuns' defensive concerns are front-loaded

    Quote Originally Posted by zephyr View Post
    In certain areas, the secondary will be improved just as you mention which is the Safety spot. However, the CB depth and experience concern me and I fear we are going to philosophically run what we have run the last 4 years that drives all of us crazy but have less depth at the position.
    K Holmes, J Brazil, and S Thomas are all going to be here in the Spring. Not to mention guys who saw significant playing time this year.

    We have the players to get to a 9 or 10 win season, it is finding the right combination and schemes to put the players in position to maximize their abilities.

  4. Default Re: 2015 Cajuns' defensive concerns are front-loaded

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    I think the evidence is more than enough to convince him of the correct core scheme to teach and focus our defense around. I'm afraid of one thing... and Zephyr points to it... and that is if he's willing to stick to it with some new secondary members and new key DL. He needs to regardless. But will he? It does concern me. He could argue to himself that it was only after our defense got the experience to play man that it worked. He needs to count on the new unit and just work them through their errors, but stick to man cover and max pressure. It's the correct path. Success isn't an event. It's a process. And Hud needs to just follow the prescription and stop thinking "but I don't want to give up the big play". You did. Over and over and over. Don't ever go back to soft cover. You'll only feed the opposition exactly what they want you to feed them. They all laughed at our prevent defense and ate us a new hole. Thank the Lord we had enough offense... and most of our schedule opposition weren't good football teams.
    It's the snowboarding vs. skiing argument. While skiing is easier to pick up, it has a ceiling. Take the bumps and bruises, commit to the man scheme, teach your players to believe in it, and come out on the other end doing 720 spins down the mountain.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 15th, 2014, 08:58 pm
  2. Offensive Success equals Defensive Concerns
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: April 1st, 2007, 08:38 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •