Would you guys stop the NFL QB nonsense? If anything is a fictitious argument regarding who we should start at QB, it's this oddball backup QB to NFL logic.
I still, very strongly, maintain that the QB next year will be a direct result of the philosophy... not the QB that "wins the combines". The staff knows what they've got in QB skills. And precisely due to the lack of Saturday experience, there is no clear #1. It will be all about which philosophy (hence, set of skills) they lean toward. I absolutely guarantee you that if they went to a pass heavy strategy, the job belongs to Brooks. If they're addicted to the stereotypical dual threat option, Brooks will probably lose the starting role. I'm not marginally confident in this prediction. I'm actually 99.7% confident that's exactly the way the QB contest will be resolved. To say that "the best QB" will be discovered through a process that is irrelevant to the philosophy the coaches lean toward... is nonsense. I wouldn't be surprised if the coaches get quagmired and do the ole two QB system in our first few games, to use real games to choose the ultimate QB. And again, it will be highly highly predicated on an offensive philosophy.
And keep this in mind, coaches are becoming addicted to dual threat QBs. Addicted. It isn't because it's the best solution in many cases. It's just the easiest. You don't have to have as great of an OL if you have a solid dual threat QB.