The difference in what you are stating and this argument is that both Mitchell and Jake have completed their careers. So people will accept that statement.
But it is the very best comparison to use. Now who would y'all rather have as a QB? Jake or Mitchell. That is what we will get this Spring with Haack vs whoever.
Boomer… we get it. You have a love fest for Nixon. I don't think anyone (especially not I) thinks Nixon is a terrible human being for smoking pot and shouldn't be allowed to play QB because of his mistakes… I think people are saying you can't name him a starter, knowing that if he has the slightest screw up, he's off the team… and then what do you do? The position is too important to have a guy absolutely zero wiggle room named the starter. Now should we play him in other places he could contribute, but not decimate the entire offense if he just so happened to get in trouble again, like say, as a complement to McGuire at RB? Absolutely… just can't hand him the keys to the empire knowing he is walking on egg shells
Thank you, Campo. This is exactly my reasoning.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)