I'm not the least bit concerned that our staff won't make a "good" decision. Our playbook allows for starting one skill set, and swapping to a different skill set, seamlessly. I simply feel that the QB they choose to start will be heavily heavily selected predicated on their core offensive lean. And once they choose a starter, it will influence them further to build around that individual's strengths (and away from his weaknesses). I've seen QB races where the core competencies are so similar, that it's strictly a spring evaluation. This year, does not look that way to me. Again, we'll know as much about what preferential style of offense we'll operate, by who they choose, more than who actually "beat out" the other via head to head skills.
This exact method of selection has happened at numerous other programs, when there's distinct differences in the skills of the competing QBs. And I still feel this coming year we may see the competition play out well into the first third of the year... by design... not because one guy was named starter and failed.
There's not much to "debate" between now and the spring. We'll not know any more then than we know now. And I can think of 10 reasons to start Haack and 10 reasons that one of the other guys may mix better with our existing skill players. The more you look at offensive play options, the more you only get more confused, not confident, as to which offensive lean, and QB skill set, we should go with.