Aww the little butt hurt gang has arrived. Welcome ladies. I'm so glad you little gals woke up.
Aww the little butt hurt gang has arrived. Welcome ladies. I'm so glad you little gals woke up.
You are correct and here is why.
Stokley had 3,000 more athletes to cherry pick from, and 30 fewer teams to schedule against.
With Bustle it was more like 800 more players in the D1 recruiting pool and 8 fewer teams to schedule.
Right now the D1 talent poll is diluted and so is scheduling, especially in conference.
Going Independent or moving to a better conference are the only two sure fire methods to reverse the trend.
Given the numbers (approximations by the way) a 9-4 record today is just as big of an accomplishment as it would have been in the Stokley and Bustle eras.
It amazes me this dead ars horse gets beaten so much around here. TOPS is used in this manner by EVERY university in the state in EVERY program. It has nothing to do with your favorite local high school athletic star, or the "one that got away". Even if an instate player is "offered", if a player qualifies for TOPS, TOPS it is, a straight business decision.
It would have been a shame to miss out on a 'Zo Harris because a third string WR was local and TOPS qualified, and we used a scholarship instead of TOPS.
It's just that back side hurt time of year because "junior" isn't being recruited by UL.
Last edited by ZoomZoom; November 9th, 2015 at 09:07 am. Reason: Thanks Z, printed out the B/H report for work...gave it to my favorite Refineryville fan
Haha this is starting to get fun ladies.
Your entitled to your opinion dude, but collectively over four seasons there has never been more talent in the program then under Hudspeth. Yes, there have been many talented athletes in the program like Mitchell, Tillman, Taylor, Green, Stokely and others during good years. But there has never been more talent collectively as a group during any stretch of UL football history. Hell, even Baldwin had some talent at times like Fred Stamps and Taylor.
As for Bustle, how was his schedules any tougher then what Hudspeth has played? They are in the same darn conference and don't tell me how good North Texas was when they were winning the conference. Stokes played better schedules at times because the only conference he was in at anytime was the Big West. But there were seasons were he didn't play much better if at all. As I said, the bottom line are results!
It's actually pretty funny when you sit down and listen to stories about recruiting not just about football, but other sports. Coach Robichaux had a few interesting stories about local products and parents getting ____ed because he told them their kid needs to play junior college ball. Heard a few from Coach Lotief as well. As you stated, some parents think because their kid isn't good enough to get any interest from LSU that UL should take them regardless of their level of talent. The same thing went on when Bustle was here, some local parents were ____ed because their son had offers from Central Arkansas and Delta State, but he should have been offered by UL in football. There is no doubt all coaches miss on recruits at times, but I never get upset at a staff if they decide not to offer a kid that has no FBS offers.
To take it a step further, who's developing our QB's? Broadway regressed each year he was here, and IMO, was not used enough as a passer.. Another clue that the scheme is the scheme and that's all there is to it..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)