In 2011... Nov.21st, in 2012...Nov.24th, in 2013...Nov. 30th. History shows the NO Bowl will offer before that date and UL will accept. Now, if you are right I'm okay with that because it allows another possibility to play out. But I don't anticipate that will be the case.
Never mind, I forgot the rule has changed now with the playoff system in place this season.
Last edited by CajunT; November 21st, 2014 at 01:44 pm. Reason: Stupid question
Been seeing a lot of items saying that with the new playoff format they don't want to announce any bowl selections until at least December 7th. That might change the selection options.
From my side, with us trying to raise funds for athletic improvements or coaches, the only way I would choose any bowl over the NO Bowl is if it was a guarantee money game and not dependent on ticket sales. I don't want to see us lose a half-million to a million dollars at at bowl game at this time. JMO
I want Houston!!!!
It's not gonna happen, but we would rock that place too!
An opportunity to play in a more prestigious bowl is something you should think about long and hard. We didn't make money off the NO Bowl, they just covered our expenses and pocketed the increase in revenue from the larger tickets sales. So I don't see us losing that kind of money unless you were planning to fly the team cross country or to Hawaii. If the bowl is in driving distance, we will do just fine. But as I stated, I still expect UL to accept the bowl bid if it is offered this weekend and be announced Dec. 7th.
Since we now share bowl revenue with our conference mates, do we share the losses as well?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)