Not good
Not good
They are 3-7, give up 40+ points per game, and they haven't changed things up? Sounds like a big fat excuse to me. It may be more but it took two months to come out?
Not a good look!
Some of you would make really s---ty jurors.
How about we get all the facts first before we gather the pitchforks and torches?
Could we please wait to see what shakes out before finding a new rope and a good tree?
What does it say about Charlie Stongs staff for taking them and usiing them? There is much missing from this story including how bad this makes Klingsbury and his current DC look as well. So you push out your DC using a story about his personal behavior, but you keep his defense and the signals he used? This has personal annimosity and bad blood written all over it. I don't know Wallerstedt well enough to defend his supposed actions and if he broke this unwritten rule in football coach etiquette then he will suffer the consequences. But something tells me both parties will have mud on their faces when everything is put on the table.
And please, for those that keep mentioning the Saunders conspiracy, let it go! There is nothing remotely true about it!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)