This!!OMG... I've been reading the posts regularly that have anything whatsoever to do with criticism of Terrance. 97% of them are normal conjecture. Are we really making a case out of the 3%? And BS to comparing the criticism of Terrance (versus the consideration of Haack in the first quarter of the season) and Les Miles. 50% of the fan base at LSU does not like Les Miles offensive approach. 30% think he's dense. Just about everyone recognizes he recruits well and is pretty decent at the administrative operation of an already successful program.
Terrance in no way, shape or form is being "judged" like Les Miles. Les is paid a gazillion dollars to be the greatest football coach, in the greatest college football conference. There is no comparison whatsoever. Terrance, for 95% of the critics, is simply being evaluated as a passer. And in the early games... he was struggling. The idea wasn't to run Terrance out of town. It was to consider another football player on the team by the name of Haack.
There is no justification whatsoever to jump on a microphone or a fan forum and dog the people that openly contemplate whether Haack would be a better passer (and perhaps a more effective QB as a result) than Terrance. At this point in this season, I do not agree. TB is doing very well. But, to attempt to ridicule them for liking another Cajun football player... is absolutely ridiculous.
And whether some of you know it or not... one of the people on here who thinks Haack would do a better job... is a former WR for the Cajuns. So... when you make these stupid comments about "not knowing football"... I think he runs circles around the majority of posters on here in the "pass and catch" aspect of this game.